Chronic stress occupies a pivotal position in the depth-psychology corpus, functioning as both a psychophysiological mechanism and a biographical condition that bridges individual suffering and systemic pathology. The literature does not treat chronic stress as a simple environmental irritant but rather as a sustained dysregulation of the organism’s regulatory systems — most notably the HPA axis, the autonomic nervous system, and the interoceptive-predictive networks of the brain. Gabor Maté reads chronic stress as the somatic translation of suppressed emotion and unresolved trauma, documenting its contribution to autoimmune disease, cardiovascular illness, and cancer via measurable neuroimmune pathways. Lisa Feldman Barrett reframes it as a disorder of body-budget prediction and unbridled inflammation, situating it on a continuum with depression, chronic pain, and anxiety. The Upanishadic commentaries of Eknath Easwaran offer a complementary formulation: every chronic mental state carries physiological consequence, making emotional habituation inseparable from stress physiology. Lanius and colleagues foreground early-life stress as the developmental matrix within which adult stress vulnerability is sculpted, while Levine and Payne emphasize the nervous system’s capacity to remain ‘stuck’ in a stressed-out state that is, in principle, reversible. Across all positions, a consensus emerges: chronic stress is not merely an external burden but an internalised, self-perpetuating condition whose resolution demands psychobiological — not merely cognitive — intervention.