Inflammation occupies a liminal position in the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as physiological event, psychosomatic signal, and metaphor for the body’s registration of psychic distress. Barrett’s constructivist neuroscience furnishes the most sustained analytical treatment: chronic inflammation, driven by proinflammatory cytokines and a persistently unbalanced body budget, is proposed as a shared substrate for conditions ordinarily classed as distinct mental disorders — depression, anxiety, and unexplained pain alike. The cortisol-inflammation axis becomes for Barrett the biochemical hinge between social adversity and clinical illness. Maté enlarges this axis into an explicitly psychosomatic argument, reading joint inflammation and autoimmune flare-ups as somatic speech — the body’s insistence that suppressed affect, particularly rage and grief, be finally acknowledged. His clinical narratives present inflammation not as mere pathology but as a legible communicative act embedded in a history of relational trauma. Lench’s functional account positions proinflammatory cytokines as mechanistic contributors to anhedonia, social pain, and depressive phenomenology. Khalsa and the interoception literature trace how systemic inflammation alters mood via subgenual cingulate activity and mesolimbic connectivity. Ancient antecedents appear in Plato’s Timaeus, where blood-and-bile corruptions prefigure the humoral logic later metabolized by depth psychology. Across all these registers, inflammation marks the site where the social, the psychological, and the biological converge.