The term ‘breeze’ occupies a liminal position in the depth-psychology corpus, appearing most consequentially at the intersection of breath, soul, and divine communication. Armstrong’s exegesis of the Elijah theophany situates the ‘gentle breeze’ as the paradoxical vehicle of Yahweh’s presence — precisely where the spectacular forces of wind, earthquake, and fire fail. This apophatic logic recurs structurally across traditions. In the Greek material, Padel, Caswell, and Onians collectively demonstrate that the soft movement of air is not merely meteorological but psycho-cosmic: breeze, breath, and thumos share an ontological field in which inner motivation and outer atmospheric conditions mirror one another. Caswell specifically cross-references the Latin term for breeze within a discussion of thumos containment, signalling the term’s role as a marker of boundary between inner and outer. Padel’s treatment of tragic imagery shows how ‘breaths’ can nourish as well as destroy the mind — the gentle breeze becoming, in Aeschylean pneumatology, a vector of charis. The I Ching commentary retrieved here deploys ‘gentle breeze’ as a hexagram qualifier denoting yielding receptivity from above, an Eastern harmonic to the Western motif. Abrams’s Romantic analysis recasts this as creative inspiration — the ‘outer breeze’ answering with a ‘corresponding mild creative breeze’ within Wordsworth. Jung’s autobiographical account of a ‘gentle breeze’ steering his childhood fantasy-vessel integrates the motif into the phenomenology of active imagination. Taken together, the corpus reveals ‘breeze’ as a consistently threshold term: quiet, yielding, and generative where storm and gale are violent and destructive.