Pneuma stands at one of the most generative intersections in the depth-psychology corpus: the ancient concept of breath as the animating, structural principle of cosmos, psyche, and body. The corpus reveals a spectrum of engagements reaching from Stoic physics through Gnostic cosmology, alchemical speculation, and Jungian and Hillmanian archetypal psychology. Hillman’s treatment is perhaps the most architectonically ambitious: pneuma is positioned within a constellation of air-words — Geist, Logos, Spiritus, Prana, Ruach, Psyche — as variant imaginings of the one elemental breath that pervades and coheres all things. Against this cosmological register, Miller’s analysis introduces a critical distinction: pneuma, captured by Pauline Christianity and Western rationalism, displaced psyche as the dominant spirit-term, but in doing so betrayed imagination for intellect, a loss whose consequences depth psychology has labored to reverse. Graver’s and Inwood’s Stoic-oriented scholarship adds precision: pneuma is the body of causation itself, the sustaining physical substrate of every mental event including emotion. Von Franz traces pneuma’s generative function into Gnostic and Hermetic embryology, where divine pneuma shapes the child in the cosmic matrix. Jung’s references locate pneuma within the syncretistic overlap of nous, spiritus, and anima in alchemy. Across all these registers the term names the question of how invisible vitality inhabits and organizes matter — the depth-psychological question par excellence.