The term ‘Breath Body’ occupies a distinctive and revealing position within the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as a metaphysical postulate, a psychophysiological mechanism, and a therapeutic instrument. At its most archaic register, Jung employs the concept—drawn from Chinese alchemical and early Christian sources—to designate the incorruptible subtle vehicle of the self, the ‘diamond body’ that grows within the ‘field of the square inch’ and serves as the carrier of immortal life. This usage situates the breath body within a long history of pneumatic anthropology, traceable through Stoic physics, Platonic cosmology, and Tibetan yoga alike. Govinda elaborates the same intuition through the pranic model: breath as mediator between body and mind, the vehicle of spiritual transformation. In contemporary somatic and trauma-informed traditions, the concept shifts register decisively: Ogden, Levine, Dana, and Fogel treat breath as a privileged index of autonomic state, a regulatory resource, and a site of therapeutic intervention. The tension between these two registers—breath as subtle ontological body versus breath as neurophysiological lever—constitutes the central problematic of the term’s use across the corpus. Buddhist psychology, as Epstein articulates it, offers a third position: breath as the foundation for a non-appetitive, unpressured sense of self. The term thus bridges mystical, clinical, and philosophical traditions.