Subtle Body

The subtle body occupies a contested yet generative position across the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as a technical term from Indian cosmology, an alchemical and Neoplatonic category, and a live hypothesis in Jungian and post-Jungian thought about the interface of psyche and matter. In the Vedantic and yogic literature mediated through Easwaran, the subtle body (sukshma-sharira) designates an energetic double of the gross physical organism, composed of prana and encompassing mind, intellect, desire, and will — the inner lining, as Easwaran phrases it, of the corporeal glove. Aurobindo extends this topology into a complex metaphysics of sheaths, identifying subtle and vital bodies as the vehicles through which supramental consciousness must descend. Henry Corbin, working in a Sufi register, locates the ‘acquired’ subtle body as the embryonic mold of spiritual transformation within Islamic mystical physiology. Bosnak’s alchemical reading positions the subtle body between physicality and abstraction, coining the phrase ‘quasi-physicality’ to describe embodied imagination. Jung himself, as reported by von Franz, provisionally welcomed the hypothesis of a perceptual subtle body interposed between the somatic and psychic registers, treating the paucity of conscious bodily self-knowledge as indirect evidence for its existence. Together these voices constitute a field in productive tension: ontological assertion versus phenomenological caution, Eastern cosmological mapping versus Western psychological reappropriation.

In the library

It is called sukshma-sharira, the ‘subtle body,’ and it corresponds roughly to what we call the mind – our feelings, desires, intellect, and will.

Easwaran provides the canonical Upanishadic definition, identifying the subtle body as the energetic, mental double of the gross physical organism within yoga psychology.

Easwaran, Eknath, The Upanishadsthesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the gross body has a kind of double, made of energy just as the physical body is made of chemical elements. It is called sukshma-sharira, the ‘subtle body,’ and it corresponds roughly to what we call the mind

A near-identical formulation across two Easwaran texts establishes the subtle body as the mind-energy counterpart to the chemical-physical gross body.

Easwaran, Eknath, Essence of the Upanishads: A Key to Indian Spiritualitythesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Smythies had written him that he believed in the existence of a subtle body that had its place between the body and the conscious psyche. Jung replied: Concerning your own proposition I have already told you how much I welcome your idea of a perceptual, i. e., ‘subtle’ body.

Von Franz documents Jung’s guarded but genuine endorsement of the subtle body as an intermediate perceptual organ between soma and consciousness, supported by the conspicuous absence of direct bodily self-knowledge.

von Franz, Marie-Louise, Psyche and Matter, 2014thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

This highly refined embodiment, called subtle body, is a pure manifestation of primal matter. Subtle bodies are embodiments existing between physicality and abstraction, in a realm of quasi-physicality, which we have called embodied imag

Bosnak, drawing on alchemical tradition, defines the subtle body as the threshold medium between matter and pure abstraction, identical with the tinctura of alchemical refinement.

Bosnak, Robert, Embodiment: Creative Imagination in Medicine, Art and Travel, 2007thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

having the form of a body, but in the subtle state, it is, so to say, the embryonic mold of the new body, the ‘acquired’ subtle body (jism moktasab). This is why in mystical physiology it is symbolically called the Adam of your being.

Corbin’s Sufi source describes the ‘acquired’ subtle body as the spiritual embryo formed after physical completion, functioning in mystical physiology as the archetypal mold of renewed being.

Corbin, Henry, The Man of Light in Iranian Sufism, 1971thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The inner is called in Sanskrit sukshmasharira, the ‘subtle body’ – that is, the mind, intellect, and ego. Both are made of prakriti, created out of our obsessive identification with the body and mind.

Easwaran, reading the Bhagavad Gita, identifies the subtle body as the psycho-mental mask of prakriti worn inside the physical body, with direct implications for psychosomatic health.

Easwaran, Eknath, The Bhagavad Gita for Daily Living: A Verse-by-Verse Commentary, 1975thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the mental sheath or subtle body in which our true mental being lives and the life sheath or vital body which is more closely connected with the physical or food-sheath and forms with it the gross body of our complex existence. These possess powers, senses

Aurobindo situates the subtle body within the Upanishadic sheath-system, identifying it as the dwelling of the true mental being and distinguishing it from the vital and gross bodily sheaths.

Aurobindo, Sri, The Synthesis of Yoga, 1948supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

It might have practically to readopt the ancient idea of a subtle form or body inhabited by a psychic entity. A psychic or soul entity, carrying with it the mental consciousness … would continue after death in this subtle persistent form

Aurobindo argues that evidence for post-mortem personal survival compels a reappropriation of the ancient concept of the subtle body as the vehicle of the soul’s continued existence.

Aurobindo, Sri, The Life Divine, 1939supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

They had discovered six nervous centres of life in the dense body corresponding to six centres of life and mind faculty in the subtle, and they had found out subtle physical exercises by which these centres, now closed, could be opened up

Aurobindo describes the yogic discovery of subtle-body energy centres as the physiological basis for Hathayoga’s power to transcend ordinary bodily limitations.

Aurobindo, Sri, The Life Divine, 1939supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

It is a very subtle body, almost not a body, indeed it is almost soul. Or, it is almost not soul, as it were, a body. In its power it is less of an earth nature and more like water, or air, or most of all the fire of the stars.

Moore cites Ficino’s Renaissance medical-philosophical formulation of spirit as a subtle body hovering at the threshold between corporeal and incorporeal, linking Neoplatonic pneuma to depth-psychological spiritus.

Moore, Thomas, The Planets Within: The Astrological Psychology of Marsilio Ficino, 1990supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Here is the gross outer body, and held in the hands is a representation of the subtle body. Do not identify the gross body with the subtle body. If you do that, you are crazy, and you think you are it.

Campbell, in a yogic meditation context, presents the gross/subtle distinction as the cardinal epistemological error to be overcome: misidentifying the energetic subtle body with the physical organism.

Campbell, Joseph, Transformations of Myth Through Time, 1990supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Subtle is a highly complex field of forces, all made out of prana. These forces, of course, are not perceptible, any more than gravitation is.

Easwaran characterises the subtle body as an imperceptible pranic field of forces whose effects on lived experience can nonetheless be studied scientifically by analogy with physical field theory.

Easwaran, Eknath, The Upanishadssupporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Subtle is a highly complex field of forces, all made out of prana. These forces, of course, are not perceptible, any more than gravitation is.

Duplicate formulation across Easwaran’s two Upanishadic commentaries reinforces the field-of-forces model of the subtle body as pranic rather than material.

Easwaran, Eknath, Essence of the Upanishads: A Key to Indian Spiritualitysupporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the true or subtle physical being within us: but, like them, it acts on the surface life by the influences and intimations it throws up upon that surface

Aurobindo identifies a ‘subtle physical being’ operative in the subliminal life, shaping surface consciousness through influences that rise into awareness as intimations from below.

Aurobindo, Sri, The Life Divine, 1939supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

you are possibly a subtle body, operating through the sense-organs … you have to prove that no kind of body, however subtle, can think, before you can know you are not a body.

Gassendi’s objection to Descartes entertains the possibility that the soul is a subtle corporeal entity, historicising the term as a live option within early modern philosophy of mind.

Descartes, René, Meditations on First Philosophy, 2008aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

for Gassendi there is a key distinction between two kinds of body: solid (crassum) and subtle (tenue) … Whether or not the soul is, as Gassendi suggests, a ‘subtle’ body, he argues that it needs the help of the solid body in order to think.

The editorial gloss on Gassendi clarifies the crassum/tenue distinction, placing the subtle body within a materialist philosophical lineage that challenges Cartesian dualism.

Descartes, René, Meditations on First Philosophy, 2008aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

in psychosomatic disturbances the flesh seems directed not by its own physiological laws, but by something yet subtler which is accessible

Hillman gestures toward the subtle body concept without naming it, positing a ‘subtler’ agency beneath physiological processes that becomes accessible through psyche and fantasy.

Hillman, James, Insearch: Psychology and Religion, 1967aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms