And I say too, that every wise man who happens to be a good man is more than human (daimonion) both in life and death, and is rightly called a demon.
— Plato
Plato is doing something precise here that is worth resisting before agreeing with. The daimōn in Homer was not an honorific reserved for the morally excellent — it was any one of the unnamed powers that move through a person without their full consent, the thing that makes a man's knees buckle before he intends them to. By the time Plato writes this line in the Cratylus, something has shifted: the daimonic has been ethicized, ranked, made available as a reward for virtue. The good and wise man earns his more-than-human status. That move is almost invisible, but it carries enormous weight.
What it displaces is the earlier grammar in which the daimonion was not a property of exceptional souls but the field in which every soul was already operating — pressed, moved, visited, exceeded. Socrates' famous daimonion was a voice that said *no*, not a certificate of wisdom. The shift from daemon-as-inhabiting-force to daemon-as-honorific-for-the-good is the pneumatic ratio at work: if I am excellent enough, I will rise above the ordinary press of the daimonic. The passage reads as elevation. It functions as distance. The soul the daimonic actually inhabits — undignified, unranked — goes quietly missing.
Plato·Cratylus·-388