Within the depth-psychology and comparative-religious corpus assembled under the Seba library, the dyad of yin and yang functions as far more than a cosmological curiosity imported from Chinese thought. It operates as a living conceptual framework for understanding polarity, opposition, and complementarity — themes that run through Jungian psychology, I Ching scholarship, Taoist alchemy, and comparative mythology alike. Jung himself invokes the terms directly to elucidate the active and passive dimensions of the collective unconscious, grounding the yang/yin polarity in archetypal masculine and feminine dynamics. Sinological voices — Wilhelm, Huang, Wang Bi, Liu I-ming — treat the dyad as the structural axis of the I Ching itself, with yin and yang not as static opposites but as interpenetrating, mutually generative forces whose dynamic interplay constitutes the very fabric of change. Joseph Campbell situates the Chinese dualism within a global comparative frame, noting its formal analogy to the Indian liṅgaṃ-yoni while insisting on the distinctly abstract, geometrical temperament of its Chinese expression. A persistent tension runs through the corpus: whether yin and yang are ultimately reconcilable in a higher unity (the Tao, or the Jungian Self), or whether their ceaseless alternation is itself the ultimate reality. The alchemical tradition, particularly in Liu I-ming, adds a soteriological register — the practitioner must work with yin and yang energies consciously, lest yin overwhelm and dissolve the yang that sustains life.