Within the depth-psychology and Romantic-studies corpus, William Wordsworth functions as the cardinal exemplar through whom the inner life of the modern subject is theorised, historicised, and contested. M. H. Abrams, who provides the most sustained engagement, constructs Wordsworth as the inaugurator of a secularised Romantic theodicy: the crisis-autobiography of The Prelude enacts a circuitous journey from primal unity through alienation to imaginative recovery, translating theological categories — Fall, redemption, apocalypse — into the growth of a human mind. Abrams also reads Wordsworth as the central practitioner of ‘natural supernaturalism,’ restoring wonder to the common world by reinvesting ordinary phenomena with the luminosity that analytic reason had stripped away. Iain McGilchrist recruits Wordsworth as evidence for hemispheric asymmetry: the ‘spots of time,’ the use of linguistic ‘betweenness,’ and the paradoxical ‘active passivity’ of Wordsworthian attention all index right-hemisphere modes of knowing — retrospection, vigilant openness, the reciprocal constitution of self and world. Harold Bloom’s perspective is more anxious, treating Wordsworth as the overwhelming precursor whose influence contaminates Arnold and against whom Frost manoeuvres obliquely. Key tensions run through the corpus: whether Wordsworth’s ‘mystical’ withdrawal from sense represents plenitude or revulsion; whether his philosophical parallels with German Idealism are genetic or merely structural; and whether the Prelude’s autobiographical form constitutes a genuinely new literary genre or a secularised spiritual autobiography.