Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘wish’ occupies a constitutive rather than merely incidental role: it is the engine of the psyche’s hidden economy. Freud, above all, establishes wish as the motivating force behind dream-formation—dreams are, in his canonical formulation, disguised fulfillments of repressed wishes originating in the system Ucs., whose only aim is precisely such fulfillment. The wish-fulfillment thesis is simultaneously Freud’s most productive and most contested contribution; he devotes considerable energy defending it against anxiety-dreams, punishment-dreams, and apparent counter-examples, arguing that distortion, censorship, and the repression-mechanism explain every apparent exception. Yalom approaches wish from the existential side, treating it as the first phase of willing: without an authentic wish there can be no genuine decision and therefore no agency. His clinical observations of ‘wish-blocked’ individuals—persons who cannot formulate what they want—reveal a distinct psychopathological syndrome with profound consequences for selfhood and relationship. Horney’s neurotic patient similarly cannot orient toward genuine goals, substituting vague ‘serenity’ for real desire. Bleuler documents schizophrenic wish-fulfillment in delusion. Benveniste illuminates the wish’s dependence on divine sanction in archaic Indo-European thought. Taken together, these positions mark wish as the juncture where unconscious impulse, conscious selfhood, and cultural authority meet.