William James occupies a foundational yet contested position within the depth-psychology corpus. He appears primarily as the father of American experimental psychology whose *Varieties of Religious Experience* (1902) provided the empirical and conceptual scaffolding for understanding spiritual transformation outside strictly ecclesiastical frameworks. Several strands of engagement are visible across the corpus. First, James figures as a direct intellectual ancestor of Alcoholics Anonymous: through Bill Wilson's bedside reading of *Varieties*, James's concepts of deflation, hopelessness as precondition, and the reality of religious conversion entered the Twelve Steps as operative principles—even as Kurtz demonstrates that Wilson selectively misread James, attributing to him the phrase 'deflation at depth' nowhere present in the text. Second, James stands in productive dialogue with Jung: their 1909 meeting at Clark University is documented in Jung's own letters, and Sonu Shamdasani's archival work reveals that Jung considered James a 'model,' a relationship Steven Herrmann traces through Meister Eckhart as a common ancestor. Third, James functions as an early theorist of consciousness and emotion: his somatic theory of emotion—that bodily changes constitute, rather than follow, feeling—provoked a century of debate in affective neuroscience. Finally, in contemplative and Buddhist-oriented psychology, James's 'stream of consciousness' critique anticipates the mindstream concept and the limits of content-focused Western psychology.
In the library
18 substantive passages
William James, the leading thinker in the burgeoning science of experimental psychology in the U. S., took the opposite stance. Not only did he put stock in the validity and power of his own mystical experiences
This passage establishes James as the pivotal countervoice to Freud's dismissal of religion, grounding his authority in personal mystical experience and empirical research on psychological transformation.
Peterson, Cody, The Shadow of a Figure of Light, 2024thesis
Wilson also seemed to attribute the phrase 'deflation at depth' to William James. The problem: neither this expression nor the bare word deflation appears anywhere in Varieties.
Kurtz demonstrates that Wilson's foundational reading of James was a productive misreading, selectively omitting James's emphasis on conversion while inventing a phrase he needed for A.A.'s theology.
Kurtz, Ernest, Not God A History of Alcoholics Anonymous, 2010thesis
the bodily changes follow directly the PERCEPTION of the exciting fact and that our feeling of the same changes as they occur IS the emotion.
Damasio quotes James's 1884 somatic theory of emotion verbatim to frame the central problem of affective neuroscience: that feeling is constituted by bodily change, not the reverse.
Damasio, Antonio, Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain, 2010thesis
[James] spoke to Jung without looking down on him; Jung felt that they had an excellent rapport... that James was a model.
Drawing on Shamdasani's archival recovery of omitted sections of Jung's biography, this passage documents James's personal influence on Jung as an intellectual and psychological model.
Peterson, Cody, The Shadow of a Figure of Light, 2024thesis
Spiritual experiences, James thought, could have objective reality; almost like gifts from the blue, they could transform people... Complete hopelessness and deflation at depth were almost always required to make the recipient ready.
Wilson's own account of reading James shows how he extracted from *Varieties* the principle that spiritual transformation requires prior collapse of ego-certainty, making James a founding voice in A.A.'s psychology.
Kurtz, Ernest, Not God A History of Alcoholics Anonymous, 2010thesis
Eckhart was instrumental in helping both William James and Carl Jung develop their unique conceptions of religious imagery, explaining that he is 'the missing link... between Jung and James.'
Herrmann's thesis, relayed here, positions Meister Eckhart as the shared mystical source that explains the structural affinity between James's and Jung's approaches to religious experience.
Peterson, Cody, The Shadow of a Figure of Light, 2024thesis
Our normal waking consciousness, rational consciousness as we call it, is but one special type of consciousness, whilst all about it, parted from it by the filmiest of screens, there lie potential forms of consciousness entirely different.
Siegel invokes James's pluralism of consciousness states from *Varieties* to legitimate a secular developmental psychology that takes non-ordinary awareness seriously.
Siegel, Daniel J., The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are, 2020supporting
William James was an early critic of psychology's tendency to overemphasize the contents of the mind while ignoring the flowing stream of consciousness itself—which for him was like saying that 'a river consists of nothing but pailsful, spoonsful, quartpotsful, barrelsful, and other molded forms of water.'
Welwood uses James's stream-of-consciousness metaphor to bridge Western depth psychology and Buddhist mindstream theory, positioning James as a proto-contemplative thinker within the Western tradition.
Welwood, John, Toward a Psychology of Awakening Buddhism, Psychotherapy,, 2000supporting
At the turn of the nineteenth century, however, William James, who had studied with the experimental psychologists of his time
Levine situates James historically as the figure who reversed commonsense assumptions about the emotion-body sequence, inaugurating a somatic psychology that prefigures Levine's own trauma theory.
Levine, Peter A., In an Unspoken Voice: How the Body Releases Trauma and Restores Goodness, 2010supporting
For William James (1842-1910), science, unlike religion and his kind of philosophy, was remote, general, and above all impersonal. Though like Jung with a medical degree, he was highly critical of scientists making a religion of their dedication.
A seminar footnote records Jung's characterization of James as a fellow critic of scientific positivism who shared Jung's wariness of scientism as a substitute religion.
Jung, C.G., Nietzsche's Zarathustra: Notes of the Seminar Given in 1934-1939, 1988supporting
Wilson's spiritual experience emerged with the help of two psychologists he never met, who themselves were riding the razor's edge of thought, in what was still a nascent branch of science.
Peterson frames James (alongside Jung) as an invisible psychological godfather of Alcoholics Anonymous, operating through textual transmission rather than personal encounter.
Peterson, Cody, The Shadow of a Figure of Light, 2024supporting
By nightfall, this Harvard professor, long in his grave had, without anyone knowing it, become a founder of Alcoholics Anonymous.
Kurtz documents Wilson's own retrospective attribution of A.A.'s founding to James, cementing the posthumous institutional influence of *Varieties of Religious Experience*.
Kurtz, Ernest, Not God A History of Alcoholics Anonymous, 2010supporting
I do remember the Clark Conference of 1909. It was my first visit to the United States and for this reason my recollections are particularly vivid.
Jung's letter to Virginia Payne confirms the 1909 Clark University meeting as a vivid personal memory, the historical occasion on which he and James would have encountered one another.
I do remember the Clark Conference of 1909. It was my first visit to the United States and for this reason my recollections are particularly vivid.
The parallel letter in Volume 2 corroborates Jung's personal recollection of Clark 1909 as the site of consequential intellectual encounter, including the proximity to James.
Jung, C. G., Letters Volume 2, 1951-1961, 1975supporting
See William James, The Varieties of Religious Experience (New York: Mentor-New American Library, 1958 [1902]), our interpretation here owes much to Don S. Browning, Pluralism and Personality: William James and Some Contemporary Cultures of Psychology.
A bibliographic note in Kurtz's spirituality study signals the interpretive debt to James's *Varieties* mediated through Browning's synthesis of James with contemporary psychology.
Kurtz, Ernest, Ketcham, Katherine, The Spirituality of Imperfection Storytelling and the, 1994supporting
James, William. 'Frederic Myers' Service to Psychology,' Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research (London), XVII (1901; pub. 1903), 13-23. . Principles of Psychology. New York, 1890. 2 vols. . The Varieties of Religious Experience. London, 1902.
A bibliographic listing in Jung and Pauli's joint work records James's three major texts—psychical research, experimental psychology, and religious experience—as reference points for the synchronicity argument.
Jung, C. G. and Pauli, Wolfgang, The Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche, 1955aside
Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. . The Philosophy of William James.
A footnote in *Psychological Types* cites James's pragmatism as a reference source for Jung's discussion of thinking typology, placing James within Jung's philosophical genealogy.
In 1909, he was invited by Stanley Hall, along with twenty-six of the world's foremost psychologists, to Clark University in Massachusetts to lecture on the science of psychology.
Peterson situates the Clark Conference of 1909 as the hinge event connecting James to Jung's emerging career, with James serving as convening intellectual authority.
Peterson, Cody, The Shadow of a Figure of Light, 2024aside