Alcoholics Anonymous occupies a remarkably generative position within the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as a historical institution, a spiritual technology, and a clinical analogue. The literature treats A.A. not merely as a mutual-aid society for alcoholism but as an unwitting heir to Jungian psychology, Jamesian pragmatism, and Pietist theology. Ernest Kurtz’s historical scholarship establishes that A.A.’s foundational paradox — the ‘Not-God’ principle of accepted limitation — constitutes a form of existential salvation mediated through communal anonymous sharing. Ian McCabe and David Schoen pursue the Jungian homology most directly, reading the Twelve Steps as a structured individuation process in which surrender, moral inventory, and service map onto Jungian stages of ego-dissolution and Self-integration. Philip Flores applies object-relations and group-analytic lenses, arguing that A.A. functions as a holding environment addressing the narcissistic deficits underlying addiction. The clinical literature (Laudet, Kelly, Grim) documents empirical associations between A.A. affiliation, spirituality, and quality-of-life outcomes, while Peterson’s biographical study frames Wilson’s entire vocation through Jungian archetypal categories. A central tension pervades the corpus: whether A.A.’s operative mechanism is spiritual conversion, social cohesion, or ego-deflation — and whether these are separable at all.