The Wild Man stands as one of the most densely theorized figures in the depth-psychological literature on masculine initiation, receiving its most sustained treatment in Robert Bly’s Iron John (1990), where it functions simultaneously as archetypal image, psychological structure, initiatory guide, and cultural-historical phenomenon. Bly refuses to domesticate the figure: against the popular fantasy of a brute or savage, he insists the Wild Man is closer to a Kabbalistic rabbi or a hunting god — a bearer of disciplined wildness, not mere chaos. The figure carries a paradox at its core: it has been submerged beneath the waters of the psyche by cultural repression, yet it retains sovereign power over gold, grief, and the return to wounded places no inner child can navigate. Historically, Bly traces the Wild Man from Neolithic Lord-of-Animals cults, through Enkidu in the Gilgamesh epic, into medieval European folk ritual where it was subjected to mock execution by ecclesiastical authority — a suppression mirroring the broader cultural war against instinctual masculine energy. Psychologically, the Wild Man is not merely an intrapsychic content but an autonomous, transpersonal being capable of existing independently of the human who encounters it. The corpus treats its recovery not as regression to savagery but as prerequisite for full masculine maturity, ecological consciousness, and the capacity to lead others through grief into transformation.