The term ‘Widow’ traverses the depth-psychology corpus along two distinct but intersecting axes. The first is empirical and clinical: Bowlby, Parkes, Worden, and their collaborators mobilize the widow as the primary research subject through which the phenomenology of mourning — numbing, searching, yearning, reorganization — is mapped with systematic precision. The widow’s testimony drives the literature on helpful versus unhelpful social responses to grief, on pathological variants of mourning, on the continuing sense of the dead spouse’s presence, and on the differential effects of age, social support, and conjugal dependency on outcome. The second axis is symbolic and alchemical: Edinger identifies the widow explicitly with the prima materia, the raw undifferentiated psychic substance from which individuation proceeds. In this reading, drawn from alchemical sources cited by Jung, the Philosophers’ Stone is ‘son of the widow,’ meaning that the Self is born of psychological widowhood — of radical deprivation and the collapse of participation mystique. Jung himself, in Mysterium Coniunctionis, notes the ‘medicine of the widow’ as an epithet in the Isis–Horus cycle, linking the figure to transformative feminine power in the alchemical tradition. The etymological record (Beekes) confirms the term’s ancient semantic depth. These two registers — the clinical and the symbolic — rarely speak directly to one another in the corpus, yet together they constitute the full psychological valence of the Widow.