Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘white’ operates simultaneously as chromatic phenomenon, alchemical stage, symbolic valence, and ontological category. Its most sustained treatment appears in the alchemical literature, where it designates the albedo — the second great phase of the opus alchymicum, emerging from the blackness of the nigredo as a lunar, reflective consciousness that precedes the solar heat of the rubedo. Hillman reads albedo as a specific psychological condition: a cool, silvery, imaginal mode characterized by psychic motion, faith, and the recognition of psychic reality as primary — yet perpetually threatened by its own shadow of sulfur and black. Abraham’s alchemical dictionary codifies white as the perfected stage of the stone, ‘white as snow, shining like oriental gems,’ while Jung associates whiteness with cleanliness, innocence, and the first major goal of the analytical process. Von Franz cautions that white is not an ethical designation in comparative mythology — it signifies clarity and daylight but may be either positive or negative. Estés reads white as tabula rasa, the color of nourishment and new beginning, but also of the dead. Bly deploys it mythologically as the knight’s engagement. Bloom, channeling Melville, identifies whiteness as the most appalling of symbols — the visible absence of color and the concrete of all colors simultaneously, a dumb blankness full of meaning. The term thus ranges from alchemical precision to existential terror.