In the depth-psychology corpus, ‘West’ operates on at least three distinct registers simultaneously: cosmological-mythological, cultural-psychological, and comparative-religious. In Neumann’s archetypal geography, the West is primordially the place of uroboric origins — the seat of the primordial gods, the home of corn, the world before differentiation — which only subsequently becomes a place of death once solar consciousness inaugurates the antithetical play of opposites. This mythic West thus marks the boundary between undifferentiated wholeness and the individuation drama. In Jung’s comparative project, most systematically organized under the title Psychology and Religion: West and East, ‘the West’ names a psychological type: rationalist, extraverted, ego-centered, with a sublimation process that suppresses rather than transforms the lower strata of the psyche. This West is habitually contrasted with an ‘East’ understood as introverted and attuned to the subjective factor, though Jung simultaneously warned against naive adoption of Eastern methods by Western practitioners. Clarke’s study of Jung’s Oriental dialogue tracks both the generative power and the Orientalist risks of this opposition. McGilchrist recasts the entire issue neurologically, arguing that Western cultural history enacts increasing left-hemisphere dominance. Across these voices, West functions less as geography than as a diagnosis — of consciousness, its achievements, and its characteristic pathologies.