Visionary Perception occupies a contested and richly differentiated position across the depth-psychology corpus, spanning phenomenological, mystical, psychedelic, and supramental frameworks. The central tension runs between two orientations: perception as an epistemological category bounded by cognitive and neurological constraints, and perception as a mode of apprehension that transcends ordinary sensory limitation altogether. Henry Corbin, whose Iranian Sufi studies constitute perhaps the most technically elaborated treatment, distinguishes visionary apperception — a primary, irreducible faculty of the inner organ — from both hallucination and ordinary optical perception, insisting on its psycho-spiritual objectivity. Aldous Huxley approaches visionary perception via mescalin phenomenology, arguing that ordinary perception is systematically impoverished by language and conceptual overlay; visionary objects recover a nakedness of intensity that is, paradoxically, the most natural state. Sri Aurobindo frames an analogous faculty under the supramental sense, a consciousness that perceives force, unity, and divine substance behind phenomenal form. Robert A. Johnson treats visionary experience as an eruption of the unitive vision through the imaginative faculty, with lasting psychological consequence. Across these positions, visionary perception is consistently opposed to mystical experience proper — remaining within the polarity of subject and object — while nevertheless serving as a threshold or instrument for deeper integration. The disagreements concern the organ of such perception, its ontological status, its relation to the unconscious, and its susceptibility to misinterpretation.