The concept of the Unconscious Creative Agent occupies a central and contested position within the depth-psychology corpus. At its core, the term names a psychic agency — not fully reducible to the ego, the personal unconscious, or any single archetype — that initiates, sustains, and completes creative acts without the explicit direction of conscious will. Jung’s foundational formulation insists that the unconscious is not a ‘psychic mirror-world’ passively reflecting conscious contents but an ‘independent, productive activity’ with its own generative laws. This autonomous creativity manifests in dreams, active imagination, artistic production, and scientific intuition alike. A decisive tension runs through the literature: whether this creative ground is best understood as a quasi-personal inner subject (von Franz’s ‘dual creator,’ Neumann’s ‘creative unconscious’), a neurobiological process lateralized to the right hemisphere (McGilchrist), or a transpersonal instinct subject to psychization (Hillman). A second tension concerns the artist’s relationship to the agent: does the poet consciously deploy it, or is he himself its instrument? Jung’s analysis of visionary art presses toward the latter. McGilchrist’s neurological phenomenology reframes the same intuition in terms of incubation and unwillable illumination. The clinical stakes are high: to suppress or preempt the agent produces sterility; to engage it therapeutically, through active imagination or expressive arts, activates individuation.