Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘Trophy’ is treated along two intersecting axes: the archaic and the psychological. In its archaic register — most fully elaborated through Homer, Onians, and Benveniste — the trophy designates not mere spoil but a charged token of victory, a materialization of the divine grace known as kudos. Achilles’ dispute with Agamemnon over Briseis is paradigmatic: the woman is explicitly named a ‘trophy’ won by the spear, and her seizure constitutes an assault on honor itself, not merely on property. Onians extends this into ritual prehistory, reading the Greek tropaion as an effigy of the vanquished, a fixative — literally nailed down — that enacts irreversible rout and binds fate. Benveniste, approaching from the linguistic angle, situates the trophy within the semantics of kudos and timē, showing that victory-objects function as talismanic proofs of divine favor granted to the conqueror. The contemporary register, represented by Masters, delivers a pointed psychological critique: the spiritual bypasser accumulates a ‘trophy case’ of peak experiences as lifeless substitutes for genuine transformation, an image that aligns the archaic trophy’s hollow prestige with ego-inflation and developmental arrest. The tension between trophy as legitimate recognition of merit and trophy as compensatory simulation runs throughout the corpus.