Triton occupies a peculiar and revealing position within the depth-psychology corpus: he is invoked less as a fully developed mythological personality than as a boundary-marker, a figure whose significance emerges precisely at the thresholds of other gods’ domains. Kerényi treats Triton most substantively, locating him among the male participants in the divine maritime processions of Poseidon and Amphitrite, noting his composite serpentine-piscine lower body and his role as a sea-wrestler against Herakles—a role that aligns him functionally with Nereus, Proteus, Acheloos, and Phorkys as shape-shifting, semi-archaic resistances to heroic order. Burkert’s index entry places Triton at Tanagra, anchoring him to specific cultic geography. The Homeric commentary tradition wrestles with the epithet Tritogeneia applied to Athena, proposing either the River Triton or Lake Tritonis as Athena’s nurse, or a connection to the numeral tritos (‘third’), leaving open a productive ambiguity that Harrison engages through the related term Tritogeneia in her social-origins reading of Athena’s legitimacy. Cicero’s dramatic fragment invokes Triton wielding his trident to overturn sea-caverns, deploying him as a literary emblem of oceanic violent power. Bloom cites Wallace Stevens’s image of Triton ‘incomplicate with that which made him Triton’—a line that renders the figure a self-dissolving archetype, a god who becomes emptied of his own mythic substance. The corpus thus preserves Triton as a liminal, composite, and increasingly self-referential figure.