Within the depth-psychology and classical scholarship corpus, Poseidon emerges not as a single, coherent deity but as a palimpsest of archaic religious strata imperfectly consolidated under the Olympian order. Walter Otto’s reading is foundational: Poseidon preserves only ‘fragments’ of a far older, chthonic sovereignty — earth-shaker, husband of earth, lord of springs, father of the horse — each epithet testifying to powers that predate his Homeric reduction to sea-ruler. Kerényi extends this, tracing the etymological claim that Poseidon means ‘Husband of the goddess Da,’ linking him to Demeter-Erinys, Amphitrite, and a series of aquatic-terrestrial feminine powers; his marriages constitute a cosmogonic record of successive territorial claims. Burkert grounds this mythology in cult and Linear B evidence, demonstrating Poseidon’s primacy at Mycenaean Pylos and his intimate connection to the horse’s introduction into Greek warfare. In Homeric narrative, Poseidon operates as the chief antagonist of Odysseus — his wrath structuring the entire epic’s delay — while in the Iliad he embodies the terrifying force that threatens to shatter the boundary between the living world and the realm of the dead. Liz Greene’s astrological-mythological synthesis characterizes him as an originally chthonic fertility power who became god of ‘earthquakes and ocean depths,’ ‘husband of the Mother.’ Across these registers, Poseidon figures the deep, destabilizing, pre-rational dimension of existence that civilization must negotiate but cannot fully contain.