Tabernacle

Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘Tabernacle’ functions as a polyvalent symbol operating simultaneously on historical, cosmological, and psychodynamic registers. The term appears principally in three interlocking contexts: the Hebraic wilderness shrine as archetype of sacred dwelling (the skēnē of the Tent of Meeting); the Platonic-Neoplatonic reading of the celestial tabernacle as the true, heavenly pattern of which earthly rites are copies; and the Jungian reinterpretation of sacred enclosure as a symbol for the Self’s immanence within psychic life. Edinger is among the most explicit in drawing the correspondence between the tabernacle imagery of Hebrews and the alchemical coniunctio: the heavenly tabernacle of Revelation 21 becomes, in his reading, the symbol of the ego-Self reunion, the healing of the split between immanence and transcendence. Thielman, working from a canonical-theological perspective, tracks the escalating typology from wilderness tent to heavenly sanctuary in Hebrews and Revelation, identifying the tabernacle as both promise and surpassed shadow. Armstrong situates the tabernacle within the ancient Near Eastern tradition of the temple as imago mundi and divinely revealed architectural pattern. Moore extends the symbol democratically into depth-psychological praxis, reading any sacred container of meaningful objects as a tabernacle in the living tradition of the Ark. The key tension running through the corpus is between the tabernacle as a now-superseded type and as an enduring structural symbol of the sacred enclosing the holy.

In the library 12 passages

The tabernacle and temple were not only symbolic of God’s presence with his people but, because purity regulations strictly limited access to them and because in them priests offered atoning sacrifices, they also spoke of the separation between God and humankind.

This passage argues that the tabernacle simultaneously symbolizes divine presence and divine-human separation, and that its supersession in the New Jerusalem marks the eschatological resolution of that tension.

Frank S. Thielman, Theology of the New Testament: A Canonical and Synthetic Approach, 2005thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Heaven and earth, which were separated at the beginning of creation, are to be rejoined, healing the split in the psyche and reconnecting ego and Self (‘the tabernacle of God is with men’).

Edinger reads the Revelation 21 tabernacle image as a Jungian symbol of the coniunctio, in which the archetypal split between ego and Self — imaged cosmologically as heaven and earth — is healed.

Edinger, Edward F., Anatomy of the Psyche: Alchemical Symbolism in Psychotherapy, 1985thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Christ, as high priest of ‘the greater and more perfect tabernacle’ (9:11), supplied this perfect means of atonement.

Thielman identifies the author of Hebrews’ central typological argument: the earthly tabernacle is a copy of the heavenly original, and Christ’s high-priestly ministry in that superior tabernacle supersedes Levitical sacrifice.

Frank S. Thielman, Theology of the New Testament: A Canonical and Synthetic Approach, 2005thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

A tabernacle tent is put up and after arrangements are made, the tabernacle erected, the outer holy place and the Inner Holy of Holies, the priests go into the outside tent every day to perform their duties, but only the High Priest goes into the inside tent.

Edinger paraphrases Hebrews 9 to show how the graduated spatial structure of the tabernacle — outer court versus Holy of Holies — becomes a symbol for the psyche’s layered relationship to the sacred center.

Edinger, Edward F., Transformation of the God-Image: An Elucidation of Jung’s Answer to Job, 1992thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Mary’s allowing the cloud of Yahweh to rest on her makes her symbolically synonymous with the holy tabernacle in the wilderness or Solomon’s temple that houses Yahweh’s presence.

Edinger identifies Mary at the Annunciation as a psychodynamic equivalent of the tabernacle: both are vessels of divine indwelling, sacred enclosures through which the numinous enters human reality.

Edinger, Edward F., The Christian Archetype: A Jungian Commentary on the Life of Christ, 1987thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

‘Build me a sanctuary so that I may dwell among you. In making the tabernacle and the furnishings, you must follow exactly the pattern I shall show you.’

Armstrong locates the tabernacle within the pan-Near Eastern mythic tradition of sacred architecture as divine copy, emphasizing that its design was understood as a celestial archetype revealed to Moses rather than a human invention.

Armstrong, Karen, A History of God, 1993thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

John identifies God’s people (‘those who dwell in heaven’) with God’s ‘dwelling place,’ using a term that appears frequently in the LXX and elsewhere in early Christian literature to refer to the ‘tabernacle’ of Israel’s wilderness wanderings (skēnē).

Thielman traces John’s extension of tabernacle imagery in Revelation to the church itself, which becomes the locus of divine presence on earth, the living skēnē in the midst of persecution.

Frank S. Thielman, Theology of the New Testament: A Canonical and Synthetic Approach, 2005supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

This was a sacred box, she says, in the tradition of the Ark of the Covenant and the Christian tabernacle. In this sense, a box of special letters or other objects kept in the attic is a tabernacle, a container of holy things.

Moore democratizes the tabernacle symbol into a depth-psychological practice of soul care, arguing that any personally consecrated container of meaningful objects participates in the same archetypal function as the sacred shrine.

Moore, Thomas, Care of the Soul Twenty-fifth Anniversary Edition: A Guide, 1992supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

It is not only an imago mundi; it is also interpreted as the earthly reproduction of a transcendent model. Judaism inherited this ancient oriental conception of the temple as the copy of a celestial work of architecture.

Eliade provides the phenomenological framework within which the tabernacle’s celestial prototype makes structural sense: the sacred dwelling is universally understood as the earthly copy of a transcendent original.

Eliade, Mircea, The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion, 1957supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Would it not have been more reasonable to say, ‘If any of you be bitten, let him look up to heaven, to God, and he shall be saved, or let him look towards the tabernacle of God’?

John of Damascus invokes the tabernacle as the paradigmatic locus of divine presence toward which supplication is naturally directed, using it to defend the legitimacy of sacred images as comparable vehicles of holy orientation.

John of Damascus, Saint John of Damascus Collection, 2016supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

That lawgiver, I take it, adopting a prophet’s spirit, predicted therein things still to come; for though the decoration…

Gregory of Nyssa interprets the Mosaic Feast of Tabernacle-fixing as prophetic prefiguration, reading the ritual encampment as a symbolic anticipation of resurrection and eschatological renewal.

Gregory of Nyssa, On the Soul and the Resurrection, 2016supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms