Superconsciousness

There is a subconsciousness or infraconsciousness, corresponding to the level of the nafs ammara; and there is a superconsciousness or supraconsciousness, corresponding to the level of the nafs motma’yanna.

Corbin establishes superconsciousness as a structural term within Iranian Sufi anthropology, positioning it as the uppermost of three consciousness-planes that must be mapped vertically, not collapsed into a single unconscious below ordinary awareness.

Corbin, Henry, The Man of Light in Iranian Sufism, 1971thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

one can go on asserting that the psyche is consciousness and its contents, but that does not prevent, in fact it hastens, the discovery of a background not previously suspected, a true matrix of all conscious phenomena, a preconsciousness and a postconsciousness, a superconsciousness and a subconsciousness.

Jung argues that the very act of defining psyche as consciousness logically generates its structural complements—including superconsciousness—as necessary and empirically unavoidable horizons.

Jung, Carl Gustav, The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche, 1960thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the day of consciousness is on a plane intermediate between the luminous Night of superconsciousness and the dark Night of unconsciousness.

Corbin presents a tripartite cosmological schema in which ordinary consciousness is an intermediate zone, bounded above by a luminous superconsciousness associated with the archangelic Logos and below by the darkness of the subconscious.

Corbin, Henry, The Man of Light in Iranian Sufism, 1971thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

this hypothetical ‘subconsciousness,’ which immediately becomes associated with a ‘superconsciousness,’ brings out the real point of my argument: the fact, namely, that a second psychic system coexisting with consciousness… is of absolutely revolutionary significance.

Jung acknowledges superconsciousness as the paired structural consequence of positing any second psychic system, warning that such a hypothesis radically transforms the entire view of the world.

Jung, Carl Gustav, The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche, 1960thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

what has just been referred to as ‘superconsciousness’ (sirr, khajl, in Sufi terminology) cannot be a collective phenomenon. It is always something that opens up at the end of a struggle in which the protagonist is the spiritual individuality.

Corbin insists that superconsciousness, rendered in Sufi vocabulary as sirr, is irreducibly personal and can only be attained through the individual’s spiritual combat, never through collective process.

Corbin, Henry, The Man of Light in Iranian Sufism, 1971thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

this divine darkness does not refer therefore to the lower darkness, that of the black body, the infraconsciousness (nafs ammara), but to the black Heavens, the black Light in which the ipseity of the Deus absconditus is pre-sensed by the superconsciousness.

Corbin distinguishes the superconsciousness’s encounter with divine darkness—an excess of light experienced as black—from the mere absence of light characteristic of infraconsciousness, deploying the ‘black light’ symbol to mark the upper threshold of the triadic schema.

Corbin, Henry, The Man of Light in Iranian Sufism, 1971supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

It is through this subliminal and this superconscient condition that we can pass into the supreme superconscience of the highest state of self-being.

Aurobindo presents the superconscient not as a lateral psychic register but as the vertical summit of being, accessible via the subliminal and constituting the terminal point of spiritual ascent.

Aurobindo, Sri, The Life Divine, 1939supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The superconscient in us is one with the self and soul of the world and is not governed by any phenomenal diversity; it possesses therefore the truth of things and the delight of things in their plenitude.

Aurobindo attributes to the superconscient a non-phenomenal, unitive quality that distinguishes it categorically from the subconscient and the surface ego, grounding it in cosmic identity rather than individual perspective.

Aurobindo, Sri, The Life Divine, 1939supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

a third power or possibility of the Infinite Consciousness can be admitted, its power of self-absorption, of plunging into itself, into a state in which self-awareness exists but not as knowledge… This is, luminously, the state which we call the Superc[onscient].

Aurobindo locates the superconscient as a third modality of Infinite Consciousness—pure self-absorption where awareness is present without differentiated knowledge—distinguishing it from both active cosmic consciousness and ordinary mentality.

Aurobindo, Sri, The Life Divine, 1939supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the Inconscience which is our basis here is really itself an involved Superconscience; for what is to be in the becoming of the Reality in us must be already there involved or secret in its beginning.

Aurobindo advances the paradoxical thesis that the material Inconscient is an inverted or involved Superconscience, making evolutionary emergence a process of that superconscient Reality unfolding itself through matter.

Aurobindo, Sri, The Life Divine, 1939supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

I became conscious in myself of eternal life. It was not a conviction that I would have eternal life, but a consciousness that I possessed eternal life then.

James presents a paradigm case of superconsciousness in its experiential guise: an unsolicited irruption of expanded, illuminated awareness that exceeds ordinary cognitive states and carries immediate ontological self-evidence.

James, William, The Varieties of Religious Experience Amazon, 1902supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

a supramental consciousness-energy could alone establish a perfect harmony between these two terms — apparently opposite only because of the Ignorance — of spirit status and world dynamism in our embodied existence.

Aurobindo argues that only a supramental (superconscient) energy can resolve the apparent opposition between static spiritual realization and dynamic worldly engagement, making superconsciousness functionally integrative rather than merely transcendent.

Aurobindo, Sri, The Life Divine, 1939supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Mind has to make room for another consciousness which will fulfil Mind by transcending it or reverse and so rectify its operations after leaping beyond it: the summit of mental knowledge is only a vaulting-board from which that leap can be taken.

Aurobindo describes the cognitive necessity of superseding mind by a higher consciousness, contextually establishing the epistemological ground from which the superconscient is approached.

Aurobindo, Sri, The Life Divine, 1939aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →