Illumination, as the depth-psychology corpus employs it, is emphatically not a static end-state but a dynamic, processual phenomenon requiring cultivation, concealment, and governance. The most sustained technical treatment appears in the Taoist I Ching tradition as rendered by Liu Yiming and Thomas Cleary, where illumination (ming) constitutes a central category of inner alchemy: it must be advanced, nurtured, withdrawn at the proper moment, and concealed once attained, lest its excess damage itself. This dialectic of advance and concealment — light emerging from darkness, then returning into darkness — structures the hexagrammatic commentary throughout and gives illumination a rhythm rather than a destination. A second major current flows through Henry Corbin’s study of Iranian Sufism, where illumination (ishraq) belongs to an entire metaphysics of light: the soul encounters graduated photisms, colored lights, and the paradoxical ‘black light’ that transcends ordinary luminosity, all mediated by a celestial Guide or Perfect Nature who is simultaneously the source and the goal of the illuminative ascent. Von Franz’s alchemical scholarship on Aurora Consurgens provides a third register, where illuminatio matutina — the morning illumination — belongs to the symbolic vocabulary of the opus. The central tension across all three currents is the same: illumination is at once the highest attainment and the most fragile — easily damaged by premature use, hubris, or failure to know when to withdraw.