The squaring of the circle occupies a privileged position within the depth-psychological corpus, functioning not as a mathematical curiosity but as what Jung explicitly names ‘the archetype of wholeness.’ Its trajectory runs from alchemical laboratory language—where it designated the magisterial achievement of the opus, the reconciliation of the angular (earthly, imperfect) with the circular (celestial, perfect)—into the symbolic vocabulary of individuation and the self. Jung’s readings across Psychology and Alchemy, Aion, and The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious establish the motif as a quaternary schema underlying visions of God, mandala formation, and the phenomenology of the self. The square names the fourfold material world; the circle names the infinite, the divine, the soul’s native form. Their union thus enacts psychologically what the alchemists performed ritually: the reconciliation of spirit and matter, time and eternity, ego and self. Post-Jungian voices—Edinger, von Franz, Nichols, Place—extend this reading into therapeutic, cosmological, and iconographic contexts, while Peterson and Nichols trace it into modern symbolic systems. The term’s power within this literature lies precisely in its paradoxical logic: it names what is geometrically impossible yet psychically necessary, the reconciliation of incommensurable opposites as the ground of wholeness.