Soul Formation designates, across the depth-psychological and philosophical-spiritual corpus, the dynamic process by which a psychic entity acquires determinate structure, character, and individuality—whether through incarnation, evolutionary unfoldment, post-mortem reconstitution, or the gradual emergence of a ‘psychic being’ from subliminal depths. The term organises a spectrum of positions that resist reduction to a single school. Plato and Plotinus furnish the metaphysical ground: the Demiurge compounds individual souls from the residue of World-Soul ingredients, distributing them to stellar matrices, while Plotinus insists that soul descends into body not by compulsion alone but through its own constitutional inclination. Aurobindo radicalises this framework evolutionarily: soul formation proceeds through successive vital, mental, and psychic formations, each a ‘frontal’ crystallisation of the Purusha pressing toward a fully self-expressive psychic being. William James contributes phenomenological evidence, treating Teresa of Ávila’s ecstatic states as empirical demonstrations of ‘the formation of a new centre of spiritual energy.’ Tension arises between traditions that regard soul as pre-existent and fully formed prior to embodiment and those that view it as progressively constituted through lived experience, karma, and inter-natal passage. The stakes are considerable: what counts as soul, what survives death, and what vehicle carries the fruits of evolution from life to life depend entirely on which theory of formation holds.