Somatic intervention, as the depth-psychology corpus treats it, designates a cluster of deliberate, body-directed clinical acts — physical experiments, movement prompts, touch, breath redirection, postural adjustment, and sensory tracking — deployed within the psychotherapeutic frame to regulate arousal, restore interrupted defensive responses, and restructure procedural memory laid down by trauma. The literature is dominated by the sensorimotor tradition of Pat Ogden and colleagues, who position somatic interventions not as adjuncts to ‘real’ psychotherapy but as primary therapeutic vehicles, operating on the premise that trauma is encoded in body posture, movement habit, and autonomic patterning before it is available to verbal or cognitive processing. Babette Rothschild contributes a complementary register, stressing pacing, the establishment of somatic markers for calm, and the use of exteroceptive resources to modulate dysregulation without provoking retraumatization. A persistent tension in the corpus runs between the constructive pole — somatic interventions as builders of new resources, competence, and embodied agency — and the reparative pole — somatic interventions as completions of thwarted survival responses. A secondary tension concerns the place of the transferential relationship: Ogden insists that transference dynamics are as operative in somatic work as in any other mode, and that the therapist’s own body functions as regulatory scaffold. The field thus situates somatic intervention at the intersection of neuroscience, attachment theory, phenomenology of bodily experience, and phased trauma treatment.