Significance Transformation

Significance Transformation, as elaborated most systematically by Kenneth Pargament in his 2001 synthesis of religion and coping psychology, designates a fundamental coping mechanism whereby individuals do not merely conserve their existing objects and pathways of meaning but radically reconstitute significance itself — both its ends (what is valued) and its means (how those values are pursued). The concept stands in deliberate contrast to the conservation of significance: where conservation seeks to protect or reconstruct familiar orientations, transformation entails a qualitative rupture in the individual’s meaning-making structure. Pargament identifies two primary vectors of transformation: re-valuation, wherein the hierarchy of ends is reordered, and re-creation, wherein both means and ends are simultaneously refashioned — exemplified paradigmatically by religious conversion and religious forgiveness. The corpus reveals a productive tension between conservation and transformation as mutually implied poles: failed conservation typically precedes and precipitates transformative crisis. William James’s earlier psychological analysis of conversion provides a significant antecedent, distinguishing psychological from spiritual significance in sudden versus gradual transformative change. Erich Neumann’s Jungian framework offers an archetypal counterpart, situating transformation within mythological structures of death and rebirth, kettle symbolism, and the mysteries of the Great Mother. The term thus sits at the intersection of coping theory, phenomenology of religion, and depth psychology, raising questions about what conditions make radical meaning-change necessary, possible, and salutary.

In the library 15 passages

transformation, significance is maximized by attempts to change the nature of significance itself. While both conservation and transformation are key mechanisms in the search for significance, they are very different choices in coping.

This passage establishes the foundational theoretical distinction: transformation of significance operates by reconstituting significance itself, not merely its instrumental pathways, and stands as the polar counterpart to conservation within the overall coping framework.

Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

transformation remains a necessary part of coping, for at times the only way to maximize significance may be to transform it. In the midst of transformation, we often find religion.

Pargament argues that significance transformation is not a merely optional coping route but a necessary one when all conserving strategies have been exhausted, and that religion characteristically inhabits this transformative space.

Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the methods of conservation and transformation apply to both the destinations of significance (i. e., ends) and the pathways to significance (i. e., means). As Figure 5.1 shows, any approach to coping involves conservation or transformation of both means and ends.

This passage delineates the full structural matrix of significance transformation, demonstrating that transformation operates across both the ends and means dimensions of significance, producing a fourfold typology of coping responses.

Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

She was not seeking a transformation of means alone (i. e., reconstruction) nor ends alone (i. e., re-valuation). Brenda was looking for a very different life. To effect this total transformation, she was about to experience a radical religious change.

Through the case of Brenda, Pargament illustrates re-creation as the most thoroughgoing form of significance transformation, one that simultaneously overhauls both the means and ends of a life’s orienting system via religious change.

Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The Transformation of Significance — Change of Heart: Religion and the Re-Valuation of Significance… Radical Change: Religion and the Re-Creation of Significance — Religious Conversion: From Self to Sacred Concern; Religious Forgiving: From Anger to Peace

The table of contents maps the full architecture of significance transformation in Pargament’s schema, distinguishing re-valuation and re-creation as its two major sub-mechanisms, operationalized through conversion and forgiveness.

Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The function of conversion is more far-reaching. Consciously or unconsciously, the potential convert is hoping to relinquish an old life and replace it with something new. Improvement, growth, and development are terms that do not capture the fundamental change the individual seeks. Transformation comes closer.

Pargament argues that religious conversion instantiates significance transformation at its most radical, requiring terminology — transformation — that exceeds ordinary developmental language because it implies ontological rupture rather than incremental growth.

Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Only after these efforts have failed, and failed repeatedly and convincingly, does radical change become a serious possibility. These failures in coping demonstrate the limited power of the self to reach its goals.

Pargament identifies the exhaustion of conserving coping as the necessary precondition for significance transformation, locating the threshold of radical change in repeated and convincing coping failure.

Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

My focus has been on methods of religious coping that appear to have a ‘built-in’ design, methods that are particularly suited to the conservation of significance.

By foregrounding conservation as the chapter’s organizing focus, Pargament implicitly frames transformation as the necessary dialectical counterpart — the mechanism activated when conservation’s built-in design proves insufficient.

Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The forms which regenerative change effects have, then, no general spiritual significance, but only a psychological significance… ‘striking’ transformation being defined as a change which, though not necessarily instantaneous, seems to the subject of it to be distinctly different from a process.

James draws an early and influential distinction between the psychological and spiritual registers of transformative significance, anticipating Pargament’s functional analysis by framing conversion’s significance as primarily psychological rather than metaphysical.

James, William, The Varieties of Religious Experience Amazon, 1902supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

People tenaciously try to conserve significance, even in the most threatening conditions… it also speaks to the fact that people are often

The tenacity of conservation under extreme threat contextualizes why significance transformation is approached only as a last resort, underscoring the psychological costliness of abandoning established meaning structures.

Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Used at the wrong time, in the wrong place, by the wrong person, forgiveness may result in further personal and social damage.

Pargament complicates the transformation-via-forgiveness pathway by raising the conditionality of forgiveness, signaling that significance transformation carries potential costs as well as benefits depending on context and timing.

Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Following conversion, people consistently report psychological, social, and behavioral changes for the better… the students felt that their religious change had resulted in increased self-esteem, a greater sense of joy, fewer feelings of despair.

Empirical evidence on conversion outcomes supports the adaptive utility of significance transformation, linking radical meaning-change to measurable improvements across psychological, social, and behavioral domains.

Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Two main groups of experience may be distinguished: that of the transcendence of life, and that of one’s own transformation. In order to obtain a general view of their phenomenology, it is necessary to sketch the whole field of transformation experiences in sharper outline.

Jung’s typology of transformation experiences — distinguishing transcendence of life from personal transformation — provides the archetypal-phenomenological framework within which depth psychology situates significance transformation at the level of the collective unconscious.

Jung, Carl Gustav, The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious, 1959supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The kettle of transformation is identical with the sacrificial blood bowl whose content the priestess requires in order to achieve her magical purpose. Here the blood has not yet the later ‘spiritual’ significance of a sacrificial offering, but a magical significance.

Neumann’s reading of the transformation vessel as a site of magical versus spiritual significance maps an archaic, pre-reflective stratum of transformation symbolism that underpins later religious and psychological elaborations of the concept.

Neumann, Erich, The Great Mother: An Analysis of the Archetype, 1955aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Much of human behavior is intentional. We are almost constantly deciding how to spend our time and energy… there is little doubt that we are volitional, goal-directed beings.

Pargament’s foundational assumption that humans are significance-seeking, intentional agents provides the motivational bedrock from which the necessity of significance transformation — as a response to goal-blockage — logically follows.

Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms