The term ‘Shade’ in the depth-psychological corpus occupies a liminal space between archaic Greek eschatology and modern psychological theorizing, functioning simultaneously as a literal image of the dead and as a metaphor for psychic dimensions resistant to conscious illumination. In Homeric scholarship, represented here by Claus and Sullivan, the shade (psyche in its post-mortem form) designates the surviving image-double of the deceased, possessed of diminished yet recognizable capacities — recognition, address, emotion, volition — which prefigure the later philosophical elaboration of soul. Hillman radicalizes this stratum: the shade is not a deficient remnant but an ontologically distinct mode of being whose natural habitat is the underworld, casting depth and duplicity onto day-world images as shadow gives visual form its relief. For Turner, working in an ethnographic register, the shade is an ancestor-force that afflicts the living, particularly through reproductive failure, encoding social tensions (matrilineal descent, virilocal marriage) in bodily symptoms. Corbin’s Iranian Sufi materials complicate the shadow/shade distinction further: the Guide of Light is explicitly not reducible to shadow or shade — transcendence, not negativity, is the operative category. Across these positions, shade marks the boundary between the living and the dead, between day-consciousness and its underworld double, and between the personal and the ancestral-collective.