Self Fashioning occupies an ambiguous but consequential position in the depth-psychology corpus. The term invokes the deliberate shaping of character, identity, and soul through practice — a concept that threads through Hellenistic ethics, ascetic spirituality, Jungian individuation, and existential meaning-making. Philosophers of the ancient world — Stoics, Epicureans, Neoplatonists — conceived self-fashioning as a rigorous, life-long askesis, a working upon oneself through reason, habit, and the subordination of passion to logos. This tradition is contested in the corpus: Hadot’s reading of philosophy as a ‘way of life’ is defended against Hegelian charges that inward self-cultivation represents a pathological withdrawal from political life, rather than a genuine ethical project. Within depth psychology proper, self-fashioning is complicated by the discovery of an unconscious that resists sovereign authorship: the ego cannot simply legislate the shape of the self, for the Self — in Jung’s sense — exceeds and precedes the ego’s projects. Neumann’s archetype of the Great Mother, von Franz’s alchemical symbolism, and Campbell’s mythopoetic readings each suggest that fashioning occurs partly through unconscious participation in transpersonal patterns. The tension between willed self-construction and surrendered self-discovery runs through the entire corpus and gives the term its particular depth-psychological charge.