Self-control occupies a contested and multi-valenced position across the depth-psychology corpus. In the ascetic tradition represented by the Philokalia, self-control (enkrateia) is treated as the most encompassing of the virtues—a comprehensive restraint not merely of appetite but of every thought, word, and bodily movement not oriented toward God; it is simultaneously prerequisite and fruit of the contemplative life. The biblical-pastoral tradition, as in Shaw, rehabilitates self-control as a Spirit-empowered discipline against the tyranny of the flesh, framing it as a learnable, improvable skill rather than a moralistic demand. Neuroscientific accounts, most sharply articulated by Lewis, complicate this picture: the prefrontal architecture of self-control is plural, susceptible to ego-depletion, and paradoxically hyperactivated in addiction before collapsing. The IFS framework (Schwartz) mounts a structural critique of the very imperative to self-control, arguing that willpower-based suppression of inner parts intensifies the very forces it seeks to subdue, producing a tyrannical inner drill sergeant. Recovery literature—ACA, Brown—reframes loss of control not as moral failure but as the gateway to surrender and authentic selfhood. The central tension is thus triangular: ascetic cultivation, neurobiological capacity, and the psychodynamic suspicion that self-control, misapplied, is itself a pathological defense.