Satisfaction occupies a strikingly heterogeneous position across the depth-psychology corpus, appearing as a theological predicate, a libidinal outcome, a clinical measure, and a philosophical problem simultaneously. Jung, meditating on the divine motive for creation, pauses over the word ‘satisfaction’ itself — God creating the world ‘out of His satisfaction’ — and finds in it a question that opens onto the abyss of divine unconsciousness. Freud, by contrast, treats satisfaction as the energic goal of libidinal discharge, something that can be legitimate or censored, displaced or disguised beneath affect. Yalom repositions the term squarely within group relational dynamics: satisfaction derived from the group task is inseparable from satisfaction derived from interpersonal intimacy, making it a barometer of therapeutic group culture. The addiction-recovery literature transforms satisfaction into a measurable quality-of-life outcome, tracing its dependence on social support, spirituality, life meaning, and recovery capital. McGilchrist offers the most unsettling reading: modern consumers occupy a ‘permanent state of unfulfilled desire,’ and rising material prosperity produces no corresponding rise in satisfaction — suggesting that the hedonic treadmill renders conventional satisfaction systematically unachievable. Taken together, the corpus reveals satisfaction as a term in tension: simultaneously the telos of psychic life and evidence of its perpetual deferral.