Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘sanctuary’ operates on at least three interlocking registers. In its most immediate clinical articulation, it names the temenos—Jung’s governing metaphor, drawn from the ancient Greek sacred precinct, for the bounded psychological space of the therapeutic relationship, a place apart in which psychic transformation becomes possible. Sedgwick’s explication of this borrowing is the locus classicus for the term in Jungian therapeutic literature, connecting the ritual function of the ancient sanctuary directly to the relational conditions that make depth work viable. In the domain of religious history, Burkert’s systematic account of Greek religion treats the sanctuary as the constitutive site of cult: a delimited, consecrated space that organizes sacrifice, votive offering, warfare, and communal identity. Here the sanctuary is not merely metaphor but structural reality—the temenos as architecturally marked boundary between sacred and profane. A third register opens in the Biblical and Near Eastern material, most clearly in Armstrong’s treatment of the Israelite Tabernacle as a portable sanctuary whose design replicates a divine archetype. Across these registers a generative tension persists: sanctuary as protective enclosure (refuge, inwardness, therapeutic container) versus sanctuary as charged threshold (the site of sacrifice, ordeal, encounter with the numinous). The term thus gathers together the clinical, the architectural, the cosmic, and the psychological into a single conceptual node of considerable explanatory power.