Salvation occupies a contested and generative position across the depth-psychology corpus, appearing simultaneously as theological datum, psychological process, and existential category. The range of treatments is striking: in Orthodox spirituality (Philokalia, Coniaris), salvation is the telos of theosis — a synergistic cooperation between divine grace and human free will, emphatically not earned but genuinely worked for. In Gnostic literature and its interpreters (Jonas, Hoeller, Meyer, King), salvation becomes liberation through gnosis, an iterated, process-oriented ascent through cosmic strata rather than a singular soteriological event. Guggenbuhl-Craig, as cited by Samuels, introduces the psychologically decisive distinction between well-being and salvation: the latter implicates life’s meaning, endures suffering, and intersects individuation — connecting soteriological language directly to depth-psychological concerns. Daoism (Kohn) presents yet another register: salvation as individually enacted through merit and ancestral continuity. The tension between salvation as gratuitous gift and salvation as demanding response — between grace and synergy, between event and process — runs through nearly every tradition represented. What makes this term indispensable to the depth-psychology concordance is precisely the way it bridges theological vocabulary and psychological transformation, functioning as a marker for the deepest register of human change.