Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘resolution’ operates across a remarkably wide semantic field, from the decisional breakthrough encoded in the I Ching hexagram Kuai, through the clinical phases of trauma processing, to the contested boundaries of addiction recovery. The term resists reduction to a single theoretical register. In trauma theory—represented most forcefully by Herman, Rothschild, and van der Hart—resolution designates an achieved phase of treatment in which dissociated memory is metabolically integrated into the personality at a higher level of mental functioning; it is emphatically not synonymous with symptom remission, and these authors are at pains to distinguish premature or spurious resolution from its genuine form. White’s addiction-recovery scholarship complicates this further by asking whether resolution requires abstinence or whether moderated outcomes qualify—a definitional debate with concrete clinical stakes. The I Ching tradition, via Wang Bi, contributes an older morphology: resolution as ‘breakthrough,’ the moment when accumulated yang force decisively overcomes the residual yin, a structural image that resonates with analytical psychology’s understanding of the transcendent function. Across these traditions, resolution is never merely an endpoint; it implies a durational process, a movement through stages, and often entails grieving what cannot be restored. The concept clusters with integration, mourning, trauma memory, phase models of treatment, and the phenomenology of decisive action.