The religious attitude occupies a distinctive and contested position within the depth-psychological corpus. Jung furnishes the foundational formulation: religion designates ‘the attitude peculiar to a consciousness which has been changed by experience of the numinosum,’ sharply distinguishing lived psychic openness from institutionalized creed. This definition reverberates across the literature in varied registers. Von Franz extends the concept anthropologically, contrasting the ‘religious and primitive attitude’ — one of perpetual attentiveness to invisible powers governing life — with the rationalized dismissiveness of modern Western consciousness. Moore, reading Ficino through Jung’s Terry Lectures, treats the religious attitude as an inner psychic posture, personified by the figure of the priest, through which the soul establishes genuine connection with its own images. Beebe places the religious attitude in typological relationship to introverted sensation, suggesting it constitutes one of several culturally determinative stances the psyche can adopt. Hoeller, surveying the Gnostic resonances in Jung, insists the religious attitude is not one of belief but of experience — a turn toward the integrating realities that consciousness habitually overlooks. Pargament, approaching from empirical psychology of religion, translates the concept into measurable orientations (intrinsic, extrinsic, quest), mapping its consequences for coping, health, and meaning-making. The central tension throughout is between the attitude as spontaneous psychic opening versus as socially conditioned orientation — and whether its transformative power inheres in experience itself or in the frameworks through which experience is appropriated.