Qualitative time names a mode of temporal experience irreducible to the homogeneous, measurable succession of clock instants. Across the depth-psychology corpus the term emerges at the intersection of Jungian synchronicity theory, phenomenological philosophy, Chinese cosmology, and neurological hemisphere research. Jung’s earliest synchronicity formulations, traceable to his astrological and I Ching investigations of the 1910s–20s, posit that each moment possesses an intrinsic character — a qualitative signature — that renders simultaneous events meaningfully rather than causally related. Marie-Louise von Franz elaborates this into a mathematics of archetypal number, where the natural number series carries qualitative as well as quantitative dimensions, and divination methods exploit a retrograde counting that moves against the forward arrow of clock time. Hillman and von Franz independently argue that feeling shapes time into clusters and organic growths rather than linear sequences. McGilchrist, drawing on Bergson, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and hemisphere neuroscience, anchors the distinction in brain lateralisation: the left hemisphere produces serialised, measurable, ‘constituted’ time, while the right hemisphere inhabits time as lived flow. Tarnas situates qualitative time within the wider tradition of participatory cosmology, where Chinese pattern-thinking and Jungian synchronicity converge. The central tension in the corpus runs between a quantitative-scientific model of time as uniform parameter and a qualitative-phenomenological model of time as intrinsically textured, inhabited, and psychically alive.