Within the depth-psychology and comparative religion corpus indexed by Seba, Qi emerges primarily through Daoist cosmological and medical frameworks rather than through Western psychological categories, though its functional resonances with concepts of psychic energy—libido, pneuma, vital force—are unmistakable. The Daoist Handbook corpus, anchored by Livia Kohn’s encyclopedic scholarship, treats Qi as the foundational substrate of existence: simultaneously cosmic, somatic, and psychological. Kohn’s contributors distinguish prenatal Qi (xiantian) from postnatal Qi (houtian), orthopathic Qi from pathogenic Qi, and trace the concept’s elaboration from Han medical manuscripts through Tang longevity practices to the inner alchemy (neidan) traditions of the Song, Yuan, and Ming. A central tension runs through these texts: Qi is both a material phenomenon—measurable, as twentieth-century Qigong researchers claimed, by electromagnetic sensors—and an ontological principle that underpins consciousness, spirit (shen), and the refinement of self toward immortality. The Zhuangzi corpus gestures toward Qi’s cosmogonic functions without foregrounding the term explicitly, while the I Ching tradition employs related energetic concepts (Qian, Kun, transformation) that share Qi’s underlying logic. What makes Qi indispensable to a depth-psychological concordance is its role as the medium through which inner nature, desire, discipline, and transcendence are articulated in Chinese thought.