Psychic wholeness stands as one of the organizing telos-concepts of the depth-psychological tradition, yet its treatment across the corpus is anything but uniform. For Jung, wholeness is not a static condition but a dynamic totality that encompasses both conscious and unconscious dimensions of the personality — a reality older and larger than the ego, expressed paradigmatically through the archetype of the Self and its mandala symbolism. The concept carries both descriptive and normative weight: descriptively, it names the full extent of the psyche including its indefinable unconscious reaches; normatively, it designates the goal of individuation, the integration of opposites without which the personality remains fragmented. Neumann extends this framework developmentally, tracing how the components of personality — shadow, anima, animus, persona — emerge from differentiation processes whose ultimate end is reintegration. Hillman, characteristically, interrogates the concept critically, noting that the ‘self of psychological wholeness’ reflects the God of monotheism and the senex archetype, and arguing that a polytheistic psychology would resist such totalizing unity. Clarke situates the concept cross-culturally, showing how Jung’s notion of a central psychic point resonates with Hindu and Buddhist ideas of the overcoming of opposites. Stein provides systematic exposition, emphasizing compensation as the mechanism by which the psyche moves progressively toward wholeness. The tensions internal to this discourse — between unity and multiplicity, integration and plurality, therapeutic aspiration and metaphysical claim — make psychic wholeness among the most contested and generative terms in the library.