Psychedelic integration, as treated across the depth-psychology corpus, designates the critical post-session process by which anomalous, archetypal, and emotionally charged material encountered during altered states is assimilated into the ongoing structure of the psyche. Grof’s foundational clinical writing establishes the term’s operational core: integration is not incidental but constitutes a distinct phase of the therapeutic arc, co-equal with preparation and the session itself. The failure to complete an emerging emotional gestalt, Grof insists, produces residual psychosomatic disturbance, while successful integration yields lasting structural change rather than mere symptomatic relief. This distinction — between transient experiential shifts and genuine depth transformation — is contested within the corpus: Grof acknowledges the objection that psychedelic therapy produces only temporary personality shifts, and defends integration work as the mechanism through which durable change is secured. Mahr and Sweigart, reading the material through a Jungian lens, extend this into the domain of archetypal encounter: integration means rendering mythically charged experience personally meaningful and translating it into creative or relational life. Carhart-Harris’s entropic-brain model supplies a neurological understructure, locating therapeutic potential in the cascade of unconstrained association that psychedelics occasion — with integration as the return to ordered processing. Maté grounds the concept in trauma theory, emphasizing the dissolution of the membrane between conscious and unconscious as the prerequisite for integrative work. The corpus thus holds psychedelic integration in productive tension between clinical procedure, archetypal hermeneutics, and neuroscience.