Within the depth-psychology corpus, 'Point' operates on at least three distinguishable registers that frequently interpenetrate. First, and most centrally for Jungian and alchemical literature, the point appears as a symbol of the Self: dimensionless, non-extended, and therefore transcendent — the primordial seed from which psychic and cosmological reality unfolds. Jung's Mysterium Coniunctionis provides the canonical locus, where the 'sun-point,' the 'germ of the egg,' and John Dee's originary monad all converge on the notion that creative being issues from a dimensionless singularity. Edinger elaborates this Pythagorean-Jungian synthesis, tracing the point through tetractys symbolism to demonstrate how psychic development moves from nondimensional unity toward the four-dimensional solidity of lived experience. Second, philosophical and phenomenological authors — Hegel as read by Derrida, Heidegger, McGilchrist, and the Platonic tradition — engage the point as a problem in the metaphysics of space, time, and motion: because a point has no extension, continuity and flow cannot be assembled from points, generating the ancient paradoxes (Zeno) that continue to unsettle reductive analysis. Third, mystical traditions (von Franz, Nhat Hanh) deploy the point as the infinite center — God as sphere whose center is everywhere — indexing the coincidentia oppositorum of the infinitely concentrated and the infinitely expansive. The tensions between geometric abstraction, alchemical symbol, and phenomenological critique make 'Point' one of the most conceptually generative terms in the entire library.
In the library
15 passages
Initially there is one point. Jung has demonstrated in Mysterium Coniunctionis how the point is a major symbol of the Self. Nondimensional, it is a transcendent entity.
Edinger establishes the point as the primary Jungian symbol of the Self — non-dimensional and transcendent — from which the full sequence of psychic and cosmological development proceeds.
Edinger, Edward F, The Psyche in Antiquity, Book One Early Greek Philosophy thesis
Things and beings have their first origin in the point and the monad. The centre of nature is 'the point originated by God,' the 'sun-point' in the egg.
Jung assembles alchemical testimony — Dee, Dorn, the Consilium coniugii — to show that the creative point is the originary divine seed from which the entire 'machine' of world and psyche proceeds.
Jung, Carl Gustav, Mysterium Coniunctionis: An Inquiry into the Separation and Synthesis of Psychic Opposites in Alchemy, 1955thesis
God is an immeasurable and unmeasured circle which embraces the widest mind of man in the form of a point which is — compared to God's incomprehensib[ility]...
Von Franz traces the mystical-theological tradition in which the divine is simultaneously the infinite sphere and the dimensionless center-point, concentrating the coincidentia oppositorum in the symbol of the point.
von Franz, Marie-Louise, Psyche and Matter, 2014thesis
Among the objective symbols of the self I have already mentioned the Naassene conception of the ἀμέριστος στιγμή, the indivisible point. This conception fully accords with that of the 'Monad' and 'Son of Man'.
Jung cites the Gnostic-Naassene 'indivisible point' as a direct objective symbol of the Self, linking it to the Monad and the Son of Man in a continuous symbolic lineage.
Jung, Carl Gustav, Aion: Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self, 1951thesis
The tetractys, a 'tetrad' made up of unequal members, is a cryptic formula, only comprehensible to the initiated.... The whole universe is harmony and number, arithmos.
Edinger presents the Pythagorean tetractys — whose foundational unit is the point — as the cosmogonic formula underlying both mathematical and psychological development, contextualizing the point within number symbolism.
Edinger, Edward F., The Psyche in Antiquity, Book One: Early Greek Philosophy From Thales to Plotinus, 1999supporting
A point has no extension, whether in space or time: that is the whole point about a point. Note that all the 'building blocks' of the experiential world — space, time, depth… are irreducible, and therefore require a leap.
McGilchrist argues that because a point is by definition extensionless, no accumulation of points can constitute the continuous flow of space, time, or consciousness — the building blocks of experience require an irreducible ontological leap.
McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting
We long to see that point, although it tears us. Why? There is no stillness at that point. Its components split and diverge each time we try to bring them into focus.
Carson employs the point as a phenomenological figure for the unresolvable tension at the heart of erotic and metaphorical desire — a locus that compels attention precisely because it resists stable comprehension.
Carson, Anne, Eros the Bittersweet: An Essay, 1986supporting
The presence of one point of the circle depends on the presence of all the other points. Here too we see that 'one is all, all is one.' Every point of the circle is of equal importance.
Nhat Hanh uses the geometric interdependence of points constituting a circle as a teaching figure for interbeing — each element's existence is mutually conditioned by every other, illustrating non-dual ontology.
Nhat Hanh, Thich, The Sun My Heart, 1988supporting
In Kepler's view, the two figures are supposed to correspond to the circular form and the point form of the soul.
Pauli reports Kepler's psychological-cosmological doctrine in which the soul possesses both a circular form (peripheral, emanative) and a point form (concentrated, central), connecting geometric symbolism to archetypal soul-theory.
Pauli, Wolfgang, Writings on Physics and Philosophy, 1994supporting
Many paradoxes involve the breaking down of a flow into parts or slices. Of these, perhaps the most celebrated cases are the paradoxes of Zeno of Elea.
McGilchrist introduces Zeno's paradoxes to demonstrate that decomposing continuous motion into discrete points generates irresolvable contradictions, underscoring the inadequacy of left-hemisphere serial analysis.
McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting
Paradoxes point to the Self. Let me give you just one marvelous description of the paradoxical nature of Mercurius.
Edinger uses paradox as the discursive analog of the point-symbol: just as the geometric point is dimensionless yet foundational, the logical paradox defeats rational ego in order to disclose the Self.
Edinger, Edward F., The Mysterium Lectures: A Journey Through C.G. Jung's Mysterium Coniunctionis, 1995supporting
perfectly straight roads shall lead to it, converging towards the very center, and as from a star which is itself round, there will be straight rays leading off in every direction.
Vernant's account of Meton's geometric urban plan illustrates how the classical Greek imagination structured rational, civic, and cosmic order around the central point from which all directions radiate.
Vernant, Jean-Pierre, Myth and Thought Among the Greeks, 1983supporting
like the arm of the compasses circling its centre point. For Donne, the love of God, too, meant that the created world circled the divine Being.
McGilchrist cites Donne's compass metaphor — lover and beloved, creature and Creator, circling a fixed centre point — as evidence that the right hemisphere's holistic world-sense is expressed through sphere-and-centre imagery.
McGilchrist, Iain, The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World, 2009aside
precisely at this extreme point the negative pole of Axis A can shift into the positive.
Neumann uses 'point' in a structurally significant sense to designate the liminal moment of psychological reversal — where the most extreme negative constellation transforms into its opposite.
Neumann, Erich, The Great Mother: An Analysis of the Archetype, 1955aside
it is always this object which… is a partial object. This is what there is question of in so far as analysis is a method… (it is the major point of analytic experience).
Lacan designates the partial object as 'the major point of analytic experience,' using 'point' as an emphatic structural marker for the irreducible, fleeting core of desire in the transference.
Lacan, Jacques, The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VIII: Transference, 2015aside