Within the depth-psychology corpus, the Pleiades function primarily as a mythological-astronomical marker whose appearances traverse several overlapping registers: agricultural temporality, celestial genealogy, and the symbolic language of stellar divinity. Hesiod furnishes the foundational material, deploying the Pleiades as the canonical signal for the rhythms of ploughing, harvesting, and sowing — a usage Harrison and Vernant each recognise as encoding an archaic participatory cosmology in which the stars do not merely indicate but actively constitute seasonal reality. Kerényi draws the constellation into his mythological hermeneutic by situating Maia — mother of Hermes — within the Pleiad sisterhood, thereby connecting the stellar group to the deeper mythology of Titan descent, nocturnal divinity, and the generative night sky. In the index entry of Jung’s Aion, the Pleiades appear alongside pneuma, the pole, and prima materia, hinting at their latent place within a symbolic astronomy whose full elaboration the corpus does not provide. Kerényi’s Dionysos similarly notes the Pleiades in passing as a measurable astronomical reference point co-located with mythological figures such as Orion. The tension across the corpus lies between reading the Pleiades as a practical agricultural calendar device and reading them as mythopoeic personifications — daughters of Atlas, retired maiden goddesses — whose star-form images a deeper theology of cosmos, fate, and divine lineage.