The term ‘phronesis’ — practical wisdom, the capacity for discerning right action in contingent circumstances — surfaces within the depth-psychology corpus chiefly through its etymological and conceptual prehistory in archaic Greek psychology. The relevant passages cluster around the related terms phren and phrenes, the organic-psychological seat of thought, feeling, and deliberation in Homeric and lyric poetry, which Sullivan and Padel examine at length. These innards are not merely anatomical; they constitute the locus where perception, affect, and practical judgment converge before the classical philosophical tradition abstracted phronesis into an explicit ethical virtue. Sullivan documents how phrenes enable ‘considering possibilities of action’ and wise comportment in interpersonal and heroic situations, tracing a continuous line from embodied visceral responsiveness to the normative ideal Aristotle would later systematize. Padel complements this by emphasizing the passive-receptive character of the phren — acted upon by grief, eros, and divine implantation — which complicates any simple reading of phronesis as autonomous rational agency. Beekes provides etymological grounding, linking phren to related root forms and their semantic fields. The depth-psychological significance lies in recognizing that what the classical tradition elevated as a cognitive virtue was grounded in an embodied, affect-permeated, psychosomatic substrate — a genealogy consequential for any post-Jungian account of practical intelligence.