The term 'phantom' appears in the depth-psychology corpus across two largely distinct but philosophically resonant registers. In the neurological and phenomenological literature, the phantom limb—the persistent felt presence of an amputated or congenitally absent member—serves as a privileged site for interrogating the relationship between body image, body schema, and consciousness. Gallagher, drawing on Merleau-Ponty, deploys phantom limb phenomenology to adjudicate between innate and acquired models of bodily self-representation, while Sacks catalogues the bewildering variety of phantom morphology first systematized by Silas Weir Mitchell. Merleau-Ponty himself treats the phantom as decisive evidence that neither pure peripheral nor pure central theories suffice: the phenomenon is irreducibly psychic, anchored in a being-in-the-world that refuses reduction. Fogel and Ramachandran's mirror-box work extends this into therapeutic territory, demonstrating that visual-proprioceptive cross-modal interaction can dissolve phantom pain entirely. In a philosophically older register, Lorenz's reconstruction of Aristotelian phantasia traces how imagistic representation mediates between perception and desire, forming the cognitive substrate of all purposive locomotion. The Hillman passages invoke the phantom as nocturnal visitation—the nightmare demon materializing through respiratory suppression. These strands, though heterogeneous, converge on a shared problematic: the phantom marks the place where subjective embodiment exceeds objective anatomy, and where psyche, image, and soma are most legibly entangled.
In the library
20 passages
An emotion or circumstance, which recalls those in which the wound was received, creates a phantom limb in subjects who had none. It happens that the imaginary arm is enormous after the operation, but that it subsequently shrinks and is absorbed into the stump 'as the patient consents to accept his mutilation'.
Merleau-Ponty argues that the phantom limb is constitutively psychic rather than merely neurological, demonstrating that neither peripheral nor central physiological theories can account for its affective and existential determinants.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Phenomenology of Perception, 1962thesis
Weir Mitchell described several sorts of phantom – some strangely ghost-like and unreal (these were the ones he called 'sensory ghosts'); some compellingly, even dangerously, lifelike and real; some intensely painful, others (most) quite painless.
Sacks surveys Mitchell's foundational taxonomy of phantom morphologies—from sensory ghosts to 'phantoms of absence'—establishing the empirical diversity that any theoretical account must encompass.
Sacks, Oliver, The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat, 1985thesis
If a body schema is something that is acquired only over the course of experience (in the first 8-12 months of life) then an aplasic phantom is just as impossible as neonate imitation. On the other hand, if a body schema is innate in the right way, then it should be quite possible to find cases of aplasic phantoms.
Gallagher uses the aplasic phantom as a logical test case for the innateness debate, arguing that its existence implies a pre-experiential body schema rather than a purely learned body image.
Gallagher, Shaun, How the Body Shapes the Mind, 2005thesis
Simmel claims that the aplasic phantom is not part of a body schema, although she contends that the non-aplasic (post-amputation) phantom is precisely that. The body schema's relative resistance to alteration accounts for the non-aplasic phantom.
Gallagher critiques Simmel's conflation of body schema and body image, arguing that the distinction is essential for correctly classifying aplasic versus post-amputation phantom phenomena.
Gallagher, Shaun, How the Body Shapes the Mind, 2005thesis
Activating the circuit generates a virtual or phantom limb. On the second hypothesis, the phantom is based on mechanisms that involve a reorganization of the neural representation of the missing limb in a complex neuromatrix.
Gallagher proposes two non-exclusive neural hypotheses for aplasic phantoms: one grounded in innate motor circuits for hand-mouth coordination, and one in cortical reorganization within a neuromatrix.
Gallagher, Shaun, How the Body Shapes the Mind, 2005thesis
When 'Philip' saw his reflected limb in the place of the phantom, he was elated and said, 'My left arm is plugged in again.' One day, the phantom simply disappeared and took the pain with it.
Fogel reports Ramachandran's mirror-box therapy as evidence that visual feedback can reorganize the proprioceptive-phantom nexus, ultimately dissolving both the phantom and its associated pain.
Fogel, Alan, Body Sense: The Science and Practice of Embodied Self-Awareness, 2009supporting
Forgetting is explained in the normal workings of body schemas, and the inference is that the phantom, precisely in this respect, belongs to the body schema rather than the body image.
Gallagher argues that the phantom limb's operational transparency during movement—its tendency to be 'forgotten'—is characteristic of body schema functioning rather than perceptual body image.
Gallagher, Shaun, How the Body Shapes the Mind, 2005supporting
One can experimentally induce a phantom limb only when vision is excluded. Once the subject sees the position of his real limb, the proprioceptive phantom immediately merges with it.
Gallagher cites experimental evidence that vision overrides proprioceptive phantom experience, illustrating the hierarchical intermodal regulation of body schematic representation.
Gallagher, Shaun, How the Body Shapes the Mind, 2005supporting
The proprioceptive sense of hand-mouth-coordinated movement may form the initial aspect of an experienced phantom. This hypothesis was first suggested by George Butterworth.
Gallagher, following Butterworth, proposes that the earliest proprioceptive experience of phantom limb in aplasia arises from the activation of innate hand-mouth coordination circuits.
Gallagher, Shaun, How the Body Shapes the Mind, 2005supporting
Lacking experiential reinforcement they deteriorate to some degree, and are displaced or dominated by neighboring neurons, stimulation of which can generate phantom limb experience.
Gallagher's second hypothesis grounds aplasic phantom experience in the cortical displacement of genetically specified neural representations that lack motor-tactile reinforcement during development.
Gallagher, Shaun, How the Body Shapes the Mind, 2005supporting
The data on aplasic phantoms are not inconsistent with the idea that a body schema system exists at birth. It is quite possible that, as in some cases with phantoms after amputation, aplasic phantoms gradually disappear as the schema and/or image undergo adjustment.
Gallagher reconciles the rarity of reported aplasic phantoms with an innate body schema hypothesis by proposing that early developmental adjustment causes most cases to vanish before they can be reported.
Gallagher, Shaun, How the Body Shapes the Mind, 2005supporting
By exploring the phenomenon of phantom limbs in congenital absence of limb (aplasia) it is possible to investigate the innate status of the body schema.
Gallagher frames aplasic phantom investigation as the methodological key to determining whether the body schema is ontogenetically innate or entirely constructed through experience.
Gallagher, Shaun, How the Body Shapes the Mind, 2005supporting
If the covering of the mouth and nose is such that it causes marked dyspnea, the phantom is instantly in the room and upon the sleeper's chest; thus the dreamer cannot give any information as to how the phantom arrived there.
Hillman's source material describes the nightmare phantom as a visitation directly triggered by respiratory suppression, situating the apparition within a psycho-somatic phenomenology of nocturnal dread.
Hillman, James; Roscher, Wilhelm Heinrich, Pan and the Nightmare, 1972supporting
'Affections suitably prepare the organic parts, desire [sc. suitably prepares] affections, phantasia [sc. suitably prepares] desire; and phantasia arises through thought or through perception.'
Lorenz cites Aristotle's chain-of-movers passage to establish phantasia as the necessary mediating faculty between perception or thought and the formation of locomotion-effecting desire.
Hendrik Lorenz, The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle, 2006supporting
For animals which are capable of locomotion, what imparts locomotion to them is the capacity for desire acting in concert with the capacity for phantasia.
Lorenz articulates Aristotle's thesis that purposive animal locomotion requires the concurrence of desire and phantasia, making imagination a structural condition of motivated movement.
Hendrik Lorenz, The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle, 2006supporting
He takes phantasia to be required specifically for the formation of desires that are such as to motivate an animal to engage in locomotion.
Lorenz argues that Aristotle restricts the necessity of phantasia to locomotion-motivating desires, not to all desires, clarifying the functional scope of imagination in animal psychology.
Hendrik Lorenz, The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle, 2006supporting
Phantasiai only come in later, in section (3), when Aristotle turns to thought, apparently intending a contrast to what precedes: 'But to the thinking soul, phantasiai serve as percepts.'
Lorenz identifies the point in Aristotle's text where phantasia is distinguished from simple perceptual desire-formation, serving the rational soul as the imaginative surrogates for direct percepts.
Hendrik Lorenz, The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle, 2006supporting
There was a time in Aristotle's intellectual career when he believed that there are some animal species which lack the capacities for locomotion and phantasia.
Lorenz traces a developmental arc in Aristotle's thought whereby the attribution of phantasia was gradually extended to all animals, including those previously considered incapable of locomotion.
Hendrik Lorenz, The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle, 2006aside
If desire in fact requires phantasia, as it seems to do according to De Anima 3.10–11, then it turns out that animals of all kinds must have phantasia.
Lorenz identifies a tension in Aristotle's De Anima: if phantasia is necessary for all desire, and all percipient animals feel desire, then phantasia must be universal to animal life.
Hendrik Lorenz, The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle, 2006aside
The effect of the eidolon is a kind of trickery, a deception or snare: it is the presence of his friend, but it is also his irremediable absence; it is Patroclus in person, yet at the same time it is simply a breath of air, a wisp of smoke, a shadow.
Vernant situates the Greek eidolon as the archetypal phantom-double, a figure poised between presence and absence whose deceptive semblance structures the religious psychology of the kolossos.
Vernant, Jean-Pierre, Myth and Thought Among the Greeks, 1983aside