Perception occupies a contested and generative position across the depth-psychology corpus, drawing thinkers from phenomenology, analytical psychology, embodied cognition, and empirical aesthetics into productive disagreement. Merleau-Ponty establishes the phenomenological baseline: perception is never the passive registration of atomic sense-data but always already structured as figure-on-ground, shot through with embodied commitment to a world. It is existential before it is epistemic. Hillman radicalises this inheritance through the Jungian imaginal tradition, reclaiming the Greek aisthesis — the gasp, the breathing-in — against the Lockean reduction to sense-impression, anchoring perception in the heart and its capacity to animate phenomena with soul. Simondon introduces a metastable, intensive account in which perceiving is mediation between quality and quantity, a transductive activity rather than mere form-registration. Gallagher, working at the intersection of phenomenology and developmental neuroscience, demonstrates that perception is intermodal and body-schematically organised from birth, overturning the empiricist narrative of sensation educated into coherence. Menninghaus and colleagues foreground aesthetic perception as a distinctive mode — irreducible to ordinary cognition, governed by aisthesis in Baumgarten’s revived sense, involving special evaluative faculties, emotional processing, and a directness toward the richness of individual appearances. Across these positions a shared tension emerges: whether perception is primarily receptive or constitutive, passive or participatory, and whether its aesthetic inflection represents a special case or its truest form.