Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘Orient’ operates across two semantically distinct but psychologically resonant registers that the concordance holds in productive tension. The first, developed with singular philosophical density by Henry Corbin in his studies of Iranian Sufism, treats the Orient not as a geographic designation but as a metaphysical and initiatic category: the direction of spiritual ascent, the luminous source toward which the soul turns in its return to the pleroma of pure Intelligence. For Corbin, the Orient is the ‘supra-sensory Orient, Orient-origin,’ a vertical axis that supersedes exoteric cartography and coincides with the soul’s rising to superconsciousness. This usage absorbs cosmological symbolism — the celestial north, the Pole, the midnight sun — and charges directional language with eschatological weight. The second register, prominent in somatic and trauma-oriented clinical literature, particularly the work of Pat Ogden, employs ‘orienting’ as a technical term for the psychobiological act by which an organism attends to environmental stimuli, distinguishing overt (bodily, motoric) from covert (attentional) forms. Trauma disrupts adaptive orienting, locking clients into past-referencing hypervigilance or hypoarousal. Clarke’s critical engagement with Jung adds a third dimension, interrogating how fantasies of East-West difference have structured Western psychological projection. These three usages — metaphysical, somatic-clinical, and critical-intercultural — constitute the term’s full reach in this library.