Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘Nurse’ operates on at least three distinct registers that rarely collapse into one another. The first is archetypal and mythopoeic: Hillman’s sustained argument in Mythic Figures that nursing constitutes a discrete feminine principle irreducible to mothering — one that nourishes precisely within dereliction, woundedness, and abandonment rather than through expectation of growth or personal destiny. This distinction, drawn against both Freudian and Jungian over-reliance on the maternal archetype, is among the sharpest conceptual contributions in the corpus. The second register is clinical and forensic: Jung’s Experimental Researches deploys the nurse as an actual figure in word-association experiments designed to detect guilt-complexes, rendering the nurse a vehicle for exploring unconscious affect under institutional pressure. The third register is developmental and object-relational, appearing in Winnicott’s casework, Jung’s developmental writings on Anna, and Motivational Interviewing’s comparative vignettes, where the nurse functions as a concrete relational other whose emotional availability — or depressive withdrawal — shapes the child’s capacity for self-recognition. Across these registers, a persistent tension emerges between the nurse as impersonal, fate-accepting attendant and the nurse as a bounded professional role embedded in systems of care and control. The term thus indexes questions of woundedness, archetypal differentiation, institutional power, and the phenomenology of nourishment.