Nirdvandva—the Sanskrit compound denoting liberation from the pairs of opposites (dvandva), literally ‘free from the two’—enters the depth-psychology corpus principally through Jung’s engagement with Indian philosophical sources, where it marks a state transcending the dual structure of pleasure and pain, love and hate, good and evil. Within Jungian literature the term functions less as a devotional ideal than as a diagnostic category: it names the condition toward which Eastern soteriology strives but which Jung regards with careful ambivalence. In Memories, Dreams, Reflections Jung both defines nirdvandva precisely and registers his own resistance to it, contrasting the Indian aspiration to imagelessness and emptiness with his own insistence on remaining within the tension of nature and psychic imagery. In Aion the term surfaces in the discussion of Gnostic pre-cosmic states, where the Valentinian Autopator is characterised as nirdvandva—without opposites and therefore unknowable—an analogue for the undifferentiated unconscious itself. Edinger’s gloss in The New God-Image confirms the canonical Jungian definition as ‘free from the opposites’ and anchors it to Psychological Types, the locus classicus for the problem of opposites in analytical psychology. Clarke traces the tension further, showing that nirdvandva describes the yogic goal of a mind no longer divided by opposing principles, a goal Jung distinguishes sharply from individuation. The term thus sits at the convergence of comparative religion, the psychology of opposites, and the question of whether Eastern liberation ideals are therapeutically transferable to Western psychology.