Mythos

mythos logos

Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘mythos’ is not treated as mere story or fable but as a mode of disclosure that precedes and encompasses logos — a weighty, performative speech act carrying truth rather than mere persuasion. McGilchrist, drawing on archaic Greek usage, argues that mythos originally signified the inclusive whole — logos plus speaker plus context — whereas logos was the extracted, decontextualized fragment: mythos includes logos, but logos excludes mythos. This inversion of the modern assumption that logos is the serious term and myth the decorative one reconfigures the entire depth-psychological project. For Hillman, mythos supplies the ‘mythic substratum’ within which Eros and Psyche move, and myth is positioned as ‘the first emanation of the Logos in the human mind.’ For von Franz and Jung, mythos names the living symbolic narrative through which the psyche orients itself toward meaning — Christianity is exemplary as a mythos in McGilchrist’s technical sense, providing a rich framework for the human relationship with a divine Other. The tension running through the corpus is between mythos as collectively inherited truth-bearing narrative and the Enlightenment displacement of it by ‘facts,’ a displacement that depth psychology consistently diagnoses as pathological. The mythos-logos polarity thus becomes an index of psychological health and cultural orientation.

In the library

it’s worth noting that mythos is inclusive of logos, whereas logos is exclusive of mythos. Mythos ‘denotes the whole package, the logos plus the speaker and the context; when mythos is in play, something

McGilchrist argues, on philological grounds, that mythos is the more comprehensive and truth-bearing term, encompassing logos rather than being subordinate to it.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Mythoi by contrast were the ideals of men of action, weighty, performative, supportive of the truth: alēthea mythēsasthai (‘to speak the truth’) occurs as a formula five times in Homer, Hesiod and the Homeric Hymns

In archaic Greek texts mythos is associated with truth, weight, and performance, while logos is more closely associated with persuasion and potential deception.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The 2,000-year old Western tradition, that of Christianity, provides, whether one believes in it or not, an exceptionally rich mythos — a term I use in its technical sense, making no judgment here of its truth or otherwise — for understanding the world and our relationship with it.

McGilchrist employs mythos in its technical sense to designate a comprehensive symbolic framework — Christianity being the preeminent Western example — that orients human beings toward a meaningful relationship with reality.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World, 2009thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Such speech meets every human at the ultimate levels, beyond education, age, or region, just as the themes of our dreams, panics, and passions are common to all humanity.

Hillman argues that mythic speech — rooted in the soul’s own language — reaches universal human depths in a way that technical analytical language cannot.

Hillman, James, The Myth of Analysis: Three Essays in Archetypal Psychology, 1972supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

A fact is presumed to be true independent of context. But no human knowledge is ever independent of context, even if only that it is human, and derived from experience.

McGilchrist’s critique of decontextualized ‘facts’ contextualizes the elevation of mythos: where logos strips away speaker and situation, mythos preserves their irreducible truth-bearing function.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

No world view can transcend such limitations — limitations that are by no means fatal to serviceable truths, but are fatal to the hubristic enterprise of accounting for the world fully in some impersonal way by what we call facts.

The passage supports the depth-psychological valuation of mythos by demonstrating that purely impersonal, fact-based accounts cannot capture the contextual richness that mythic speech preserves.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

in losing the narrative mode (or the rhythm of a song, or the dramaturgy of theater) the dynamic elements of time, timing, and process somehow fail to be represented.

Miller, via Heidegger, points to the loss of mythic narrative form as the root of a deeper cultural impoverishment: without mythos, temporal and processual dimensions of life become unrepresentable.

Miller, David L., The New Polytheism: Rebirth of the Gods and Goddesses, 1974aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms