Within the depth-psychology corpus, the Moirae occupy a singular position at the intersection of archaic cosmology, archetypal psychology, and the perennial problem of fate versus freedom. The primary scholarly voices—Otto, Kerényi, Neumann, Onians, Harrison, Hillman, and Greene—converge on the Moirae as pre-Olympian powers whose genealogical ties to Night, the Erinyes, and Aphrodite Urania mark them as denizens of a chthonic stratum older and more fundamental than the Olympian dispensation. Otto establishes that in Homer, Moira operates as a singular, mighty force (moira krataie) distinct from the later triad of popular belief, while Hesiod’s version presents them as daughters of Zeus and Themis—daughters, that is, of cosmic order itself. Neumann reads the Moirae through the archetype of the Great Mother as weaving goddesses, spinning the thread of existence within the primordial feminine domain of time and destiny. Hillman sharpens the psychological edge, aligning them with Ananke and the Keres as winged images of fateful necessity experienced within the soul. Greene extends this into clinical astrological practice, arguing that Moira persists as a living image in the horoscopic imagination. Alexiou traces the term’s continuity from ancient funerary inscription into Byzantine lamentation poetry, documenting Moira’s direct address in the ritual protest against death. Together these voices sustain a productive tension between Moira as inexorable external fate and as a psychological interior necessity that consciousness may, at best, deepen its relationship with but never fully transcend.